![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the solution. Could someone point us good documentation on clustering. We are particularly interested in Active/Active/Active/Passive Thanks in advance Amar |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the solution. Could someone point us good documentation on clustering. We are particularly interested in Active/Active/Active/Passive Thanks in advance Amar . |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- I assume you mean 4 nodes and 3 SQL instances? I haven't seen much documentation on clusters with more than two nodes, but it is very much possible. I have such a system running for about 8 months and it works very well. Most of the standard clustering stuff applies, just with a few extra twists. Here is a good overview on SQL failover clustering: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../sql/2000/main tain/failclus.mspx -- Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP Senior Database Administrator Careerbuilder.com I support the Professional Association for SQL Server www.sqlpass.org "Amar" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:2cc1c01c46a68$d62f8cc0$a601280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the solution. Could someone point us good documentation on clustering. We are particularly interested in Active/Active/Active/Passive Thanks in advance Amar . |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Thanks a lot for your quick response. One more question. Can we have Active/Active/Active/Passive talking to single database? -----Original Message----- I assume you mean 4 nodes and 3 SQL instances? I haven't seen much documentation on clusters with more than two nodes, but it is very much possible. I have such a system running for about 8 months and it works very well. Most of the standard clustering stuff applies, just with a few extra twists. Here is a good overview on SQL failover clustering: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../sql/2000/main tain/failclus.mspx -- Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP Senior Database Administrator Careerbuilder.com I support the Professional Association for SQL Server www.sqlpass.org "Amar" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:2cc1c01c46a68$d62f8cc0$a601280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl... We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the solution. Could someone point us good documentation on clustering. We are particularly interested in Active/Active/Active/Passive Thanks in advance Amar . |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Thanks a lot for your quick response. One more question. Can we have Active/Active/Active/Passive talking to single database? -----Original Message----- We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the solution. Could someone point us good documentation on clustering. We are particularly interested in Active/Active/Active/Passive Thanks in advance Amar . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |