dbTalk Databases Forums  

Active/Active/Active/Passive

microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering


Discuss Active/Active/Active/Passive in the microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Amar
 
Posts: n/a

Default Active/Active/Active/Passive - 07-15-2004 , 07:39 AM






We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the
solution. Could someone point us good documentation on
clustering. We are particularly interested in
Active/Active/Active/Passive

Thanks in advance
Amar

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Geoff N. Hiten
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Active/Active/Active/Passive - 07-15-2004 , 10:20 AM






I assume you mean 4 nodes and 3 SQL instances? I haven't seen much
documentation on clusters with more than two nodes, but it is very much
possible. I have such a system running for about 8 months and it works very
well. Most of the standard clustering stuff applies, just with a few extra
twists. Here is a good overview on SQL failover clustering:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../failclus.mspx


--
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com

I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org

"Amar" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote

Quote:
We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the
solution. Could someone point us good documentation on
clustering. We are particularly interested in
Active/Active/Active/Passive

Thanks in advance
Amar



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Amar
 
Posts: n/a

Default Active/Active/Active/Passive - 07-15-2004 , 12:02 PM



Hi Thanks a lot for your quick response.
One more question. Can we have
Active/Active/Active/Passive talking to single database?

Quote:
-----Original Message-----
We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the
solution. Could someone point us good documentation on
clustering. We are particularly interested in
Active/Active/Active/Passive

Thanks in advance
Amar
.


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Amar
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Active/Active/Active/Passive - 07-15-2004 , 12:02 PM



Hi Thanks a lot for your quick response.
One more question. Can we have
Active/Active/Active/Passive talking to single database?

Quote:
-----Original Message-----
I assume you mean 4 nodes and 3 SQL instances? I
haven't seen much
documentation on clusters with more than two nodes, but
it is very much
possible. I have such a system running for about 8
months and it works very
well. Most of the standard clustering stuff applies,
just with a few extra
twists. Here is a good overview on SQL failover
clustering:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../sql/2000/main
tain/failclus.mspx


--
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com

I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org

"Amar" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in
message
news:2cc1c01c46a68$d62f8cc0$a601280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl...
We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the
solution. Could someone point us good documentation on
clustering. We are particularly interested in
Active/Active/Active/Passive

Thanks in advance
Amar


.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Geoff N. Hiten
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Active/Active/Active/Passive - 07-15-2004 , 01:25 PM



No. SQL clustering is a failover technology, not a scale-out technology.
Each instance has a unique set of databases and appears on the network as a
complete and unique virtual system. Read over the link I included to get a
better idea of what SQL clustering really does. It is critical to
understand the benefits and limitations of SQL clustering before you try and
build a highly available system around that technology.

--
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com

I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org

"Amar" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote

Quote:
Hi Thanks a lot for your quick response.
One more question. Can we have
Active/Active/Active/Passive talking to single database?

-----Original Message-----
I assume you mean 4 nodes and 3 SQL instances? I
haven't seen much
documentation on clusters with more than two nodes, but
it is very much
possible. I have such a system running for about 8
months and it works very
well. Most of the standard clustering stuff applies,
just with a few extra
twists. Here is a good overview on SQL failover
clustering:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../sql/2000/main
tain/failclus.mspx


--
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com

I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org

"Amar" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in
message
news:2cc1c01c46a68$d62f8cc0$a601280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl...
We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the
solution. Could someone point us good documentation on
clustering. We are particularly interested in
Active/Active/Active/Passive

Thanks in advance
Amar


.




Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Anonimo
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Active/Active/Active/Passive - 07-21-2004 , 05:41 AM



No.

"Amar" <anonymous (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:2da4801c46a8d$88b60620$a401280a (AT) phx (DOT) gbl...
Quote:
Hi Thanks a lot for your quick response.
One more question. Can we have
Active/Active/Active/Passive talking to single database?

-----Original Message-----
We are using SQL2000 and considering clustering the
solution. Could someone point us good documentation on
clustering. We are particularly interested in
Active/Active/Active/Passive

Thanks in advance
Amar
.




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.