![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
oops, post should have gone to this forum ..... Hi, I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443), that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives? I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found confirmation anywhere. Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these restrictions on hardware? If we want to go 64-bit, are we basically forced to accept a fibre-based SAN as I/O system? Thank you. Craig |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Windows 2003 64-bit does not require fibre drives. You can use anything internal for the nodes. The shared disk can be Parallel Attached SCSI (though I would not), iSCSI or SAN based. Now Windows 2008 will not support PAS, but it will support SAS, SAN, or iSCSI. Cheers, Rodney R. Fournier MVP - Windows Server - Clustering http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner "craig_amtdatatechnologies (AT) discussions (DOT) mi" craigamtdatatechnologiesdiscussionsm... microsoft.com> wrote in message news:B1B0C4B4-B45D-4217-AC25-3A2D7A4B362B (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... oops, post should have gone to this forum ..... Hi, I read in the SQL 2005 Exam guides for clustering that (p.283 - 70-443), that if building a cluster on 64-bit Windows then must use Fibre drives? I'm trying to verying this with help of Google/MSDN, and not found confirmation anywhere. Is this the case that running a cluster on 64-bit editions places these restrictions on hardware? If we want to go 64-bit, are we basically forced to accept a fibre-based SAN as I/O system? Thank you. Craig |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |