![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is it possible to have 4 SQL instances in Cluster on 2 windows server. Active/passive set-up. In detail, what i mean is: I have 2 windows OS - WinClustA with WinClustB On WinClustA - SQLInstA (active) and SQLInstY (passive) On WinClustB - SQLInstB (passive) and SQLInstX (active) In case of failure, SQLInstA will failover to SQLInstB and SQLInstX will failover to SQLInstY Is this possible to configure? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
You have a misunderstanding of how clustering works. What you want is 2 SQL instances: SQLInstA and SQLInstB. With SQL clustering, each instance can run on any host node, but only on one node at a time. Normally you will have SQLInstA running on WinClustA and SQLInstB on WinClustB. Should either node fail, the other node runs both instances. That is how clustering works and yes, it is possible. Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP "Pari" <Pari (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E4D2C97A-8B60-4E64-A5E3-37215C1456FE (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Is it possible to have 4 SQL instances in Cluster on 2 windows server. Active/passive set-up. In detail, what i mean is: I have 2 windows OS - WinClustA with WinClustB On WinClustA - SQLInstA (active) and SQLInstY (passive) On WinClustB - SQLInstB (passive) and SQLInstX (active) In case of failure, SQLInstA will failover to SQLInstB and SQLInstX will failover to SQLInstY Is this possible to configure? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
While my SQLInstB instance is passive on windows machine WinclustB, I do not want to waste the resource on winClustB, I want to install another instance called SQLInstX (active), and host another set of databases from this instance. Hence each WinclustA and WinclustB I will have one active SQL Instance and one passive SQL Instance. I have not worked with clustering too much, so please inform if this is possible. I did read all the content in SQL BOL fro clustering. "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote: You have a misunderstanding of how clustering works. What you want is 2 SQL instances: SQLInstA and SQLInstB. With SQL clustering, each instance can run on any host node, but only on one node at a time. Normally you will have SQLInstA running on WinClustA and SQLInstB on WinClustB. Should either node fail, the other node runs both instances. That is how clustering works and yes, it is possible. Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP "Pari" <Pari (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E4D2C97A-8B60-4E64-A5E3-37215C1456FE (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Is it possible to have 4 SQL instances in Cluster on 2 windows server. Active/passive set-up. In detail, what i mean is: I have 2 windows OS - WinClustA with WinClustB On WinClustA - SQLInstA (active) and SQLInstY (passive) On WinClustB - SQLInstB (passive) and SQLInstX (active) In case of failure, SQLInstA will failover to SQLInstB and SQLInstX will failover to SQLInstY Is this possible to configure? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
While my SQLInstB instance is passive on windows machine WinclustB, I do not want to waste the resource on winClustB, I want to install another instance called SQLInstX (active), and host another set of databases from this instance. Hence each WinclustA and WinclustB I will have one active SQL Instance and one passive SQL Instance. I have not worked with clustering too much, so please inform if this is possible. I did read all the content in SQL BOL fro clustering. "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote: You have a misunderstanding of how clustering works. What you want is 2 SQL instances: SQLInstA and SQLInstB. With SQL clustering, each instance can run on any host node, but only on one node at a time. Normally you will have SQLInstA running on WinClustA and SQLInstB on WinClustB. Should either node fail, the other node runs both instances. That is how clustering works and yes, it is possible. Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP "Pari" <Pari (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E4D2C97A-8B60-4E64-A5E3-37215C1456FE (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Is it possible to have 4 SQL instances in Cluster on 2 windows server. Active/passive set-up. In detail, what i mean is: I have 2 windows OS - WinClustA with WinClustB On WinClustA - SQLInstA (active) and SQLInstY (passive) On WinClustB - SQLInstB (passive) and SQLInstX (active) In case of failure, SQLInstA will failover to SQLInstB and SQLInstX will failover to SQLInstY Is this possible to configure? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Active and Passive are obsolete terms used to describe SQL 7.0 clustering. They do not apply to SQL 2000 clustering. Even then, "Active" and "Passive" referred to host nodes, not instances. An clustered instance of SQL Server 2000 does not have any "active" or "passive" context. It is an instance, period. You want two SQL instances which will each run on separate nodes (host computers) except during failure. That is what I described to you under SQL 2000 clustering. Node A runs one instance and Node B runs another instance. Should one node fail, the other node starts running both instances of SQL server. There is no "passive" instance anywhere. The "Active" instance simply changes host nodes. Again, this is possible. You can have up to 4 host nodes and 16 SQL instances in a SQL 2000 cluster. You can choose the normal host node and the failure path of each SQL instance separately. Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP "Pari" <Pari (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:EF0D86F1-EEBF-48F7-A92A-CAFE5531DB05 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... While my SQLInstB instance is passive on windows machine WinclustB, I do not want to waste the resource on winClustB, I want to install another instance called SQLInstX (active), and host another set of databases from this instance. Hence each WinclustA and WinclustB I will have one active SQL Instance and one passive SQL Instance. I have not worked with clustering too much, so please inform if this is possible. I did read all the content in SQL BOL fro clustering. "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote: You have a misunderstanding of how clustering works. What you want is 2 SQL instances: SQLInstA and SQLInstB. With SQL clustering, each instance can run on any host node, but only on one node at a time. Normally you will have SQLInstA running on WinClustA and SQLInstB on WinClustB. Should either node fail, the other node runs both instances. That is how clustering works and yes, it is possible. Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP "Pari" <Pari (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E4D2C97A-8B60-4E64-A5E3-37215C1456FE (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Is it possible to have 4 SQL instances in Cluster on 2 windows server. Active/passive set-up. In detail, what i mean is: I have 2 windows OS - WinClustA with WinClustB On WinClustA - SQLInstA (active) and SQLInstY (passive) On WinClustB - SQLInstB (passive) and SQLInstX (active) In case of failure, SQLInstA will failover to SQLInstB and SQLInstX will failover to SQLInstY Is this possible to configure? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |