![]() | |
#101
| |||
| |||
|
|
you could still do that with a 2x2 all that it would mean is that you'd lose that possibility to cluster a vserver across 4 nodes. You do introduces more risk on a 4 node too, in that if your quorum corrupts all 4 nodes will die. On a 2x2 obviously only 2 nodes will die. However that said I've built 4 node 64 bit with no problems to date. Regards, Mark. "MK" <MK (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:3119F2F9-9E4A-4392-8E74-0711DB68D426 (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... Rich to you other question on why we want one big cluster? We have tones of single instance enviornments so by staging a HA schalable env the vision is it move them all onto these virtual servers. "MK" wrote: I want to setup A/A SQL 2k and 2k5 virtual servers on a 4 node OS cluster. Don't know if they can coexist on same nodes. "Justin Rich" wrote: Wouldnt that just be 2 x 2 node clusters? why would you want to make it one big cluster? "MK" <MK (AT) discussions (DOT) microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F51F3854-4D2C-4763-8B6F-D2CCD3339DBD (AT) microsoft (DOT) com... We have mix of both SQL 2000 and 2005 enviroments. The push is to consolidate. On 4 node windows 2003 64 bit cluster: Is it possible to host on 2 nodes - SQL 2000 A/A Virtual server and on 3rd and 4th node SQL 2005 A/A vuirtual server? All virtual servers will have have there own database drives. MSDTC will be in its own group containing IP and drive for MSDTC logs. Do you see any issues? suggestions plz. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |