![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for your information, I only need to update couple of columns data from USA to Canada or may be from Canada to USA not all the tables. Replication is only the solution? Thanks "Russell Fields" <russellfields (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:uTA4qLYmIHA.464 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP02 (DOT) phx.gbl... Noor, Canada and USA servers are linked in what way, what is your line speed between the servers, et cetera. Unless the communication is pretty fast, I doubt that you want to use a distributed transaction to keep the two servers in sychronization. And, even if it is fast it can go down. Do you want one server to be locked up waiting for the other to respond? I would not recommend that kind of dependency between remote servers. I would suggest that you read about replication to see if that serves your needs. If you want updates to flow both directions, then read about merge replication. Here is a link to some replication tuturials: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa337389.aspx If you pursue replication as a strategy, you can post additional questions at: microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication RLF "Noor" <naissani (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:uVb8U1RmIHA.5692 (AT) TK2MSFTNGP03 (DOT) phx.gbl... Dear Professional, I would highly appreciate if you can guide me for my one problem, I have two servers and I want to create link server. One is at Canada and other one is at USA. Now the problem is that both are not on domain and I am wondering about performance. I might to update the information if happend on Canada box to USA box. Now the question is SP_ADDLINKEDSERVER is a good option to do this? In which box I have to create Linked Server Canada Box or USA Box? this should be real time update, how about performance? any thing I have to take care before creating linked server on the production box? Thanks |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |