![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
1. Whether merge replication and active/active' configuration you described make sense depends on your business requirements. For many apps that must maintain a single copy of truth (e.g. your bank account), this would not make sense. 2. Transactional replication should work for the scenario you described. 3. You can't use a database mirror for transactional/merge replication. Linchi "Noor" wrote: Dear Professional, I would like to ask couple of question in terms of Load Balancing, Replication, Database Mirroring. 1. Our organization has two production servers, one is on Toronto and other one is on New York. In New York I have five databases and Toronto I have nine databases. Now the requirement is I have to create two instance in New York box and top of that we have to install F5 BIG IP so that we can use Load Balancing as well as have to create Merge Replication so that both the instance would work as Active Active... Question, is there any other way we can use Active Active or the above solution is the best one? 2. Now the requirment is if any thing update on New York Box then it has to replicate on Toronto. I think Transaction Replication is the best solution? Am I right? Is it possible if user want to retrive any data it calls the data from Toronto box and if the user want to update the data the application point to New York box and replicate the data to Toronto automatically through Transaction Replication, is it possible? 3. A part from Merge Replication and Transaction Replication, I have to create Data Mirroing for Disaster Recovery, Is is possible I can use same database for Merge Replication and Database Mirroring ? I would appreciate if anyone help me out? Thanks |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |