![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm seeing this in my PGSQL logs, is this something to be concerned about? I know the file system it sits on is reliable and the DB appears to run with fine, additionally the log indicates it's a debug message. I did some google searches and didn't find much. When I examine the file system file by these names to not exist. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Wayne Cuddy <lists-pgsql (AT) useunix (DOT) net> writes: I'm seeing this in my PGSQL logs, is this something to be concerned about? I know the file system it sits on is reliable and the DB appears to run with fine, additionally the log indicates it's a debug message. I did some google searches and didn't find much. When I examine the file system file by these names to not exist. If it only complains once per file name, this is expected behavior when somebody drops a table just before the checkpoint mechanism tries to fsync it. (If the failure were to repeat, then it might be something more interesting.) It does seem a bit odd that only fsm files are being complained of, though. What PG version is that exactly? regards, tom lane |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:23:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: If it only complains once per file name, this is expected behavior when somebody drops a table just before the checkpoint mechanism tries to fsync it. (If the failure were to repeat, then it might be something more interesting.) It does seem a bit odd that only fsm files are being complained of, though. What PG version is that exactly? It's 9.0.4. I'm frequently truncating tables but not dropping them. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Wayne Cuddy <lists-pgsql (AT) useunix (DOT) net> writes: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:23:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: If it only complains once per file name, this is expected behavior when somebody drops a table just before the checkpoint mechanism tries to fsync it. (If the failure were to repeat, then it might be something more interesting.) It does seem a bit odd that only fsm files are being complained of, though. What PG version is that exactly? It's 9.0.4. I'm frequently truncating tables but not dropping them. Under the hood, TRUNCATE creates a new empty table and then drops the old one after commit. So that sounds consistent. It's still a bit odd that all the messages are about FSM files, but maybe that has something to do with sequence-of-operations in the DROP. Anyway, nothing to see here AFAICT. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql (AT) postgresql (DOT) org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |