dbTalk Databases Forums  

[PORTS] Warp

mailing.database.pgsql-ports mailing.database.pgsql-ports


Discuss [PORTS] Warp in the mailing.database.pgsql-ports forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Eric Caloone
 
Posts: n/a

Default [PORTS] Warp - 01-09-2005 , 04:05 AM






It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).
--

/
/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo (AT) postgresql (DOT) org)

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Peter Eisentraut
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [PORTS] Warp - 01-09-2005 , 05:03 AM






Eric Caloone wrote:
Quote:
It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).
That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo (AT) postgresql (DOT) org)


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [PORTS] Warp - 01-09-2005 , 02:40 PM



Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Quote:
Eric Caloone wrote:
It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).

That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?
Someone posted an 8.0rc4 binary and it is mentioned in the current FAQ,
so yea, I think it works.

http://hobbes.nmsu.edu/cgi-bin/h-sea...t=type&dir=%2F

I assume the source is included.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman (AT) candle (DOT) pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [PORTS] Warp - 01-09-2005 , 03:19 PM



Bruce Momjian <pgman (AT) candle (DOT) pha.pa.us> writes:
Quote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Eric Caloone wrote:
It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).

That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?

Someone posted an 8.0rc4 binary and it is mentioned in the current FAQ,
so yea, I think it works.
Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.

As of 8.0 the spinlock support should be driven by CPU type not OS type,
so as long as you build using a compiler that defines standard CPU
symbols it should work. In particular I'd expect a gcc build on OS/2 to
not have any issues about spinlocks.

Shared libraries are another story --- there is no way we'd build shared
libraries successfully without a Makefile.os2 and some additions to
Makefile.shlib. Given the importance of plpgsql I don't think we could
consider a build with --disable-shared to be a "supported platform".

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [PORTS] Warp - 01-09-2005 , 04:03 PM



Tom Lane wrote:
Quote:
Bruce Momjian <pgman (AT) candle (DOT) pha.pa.us> writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Eric Caloone wrote:
It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).

That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?

Someone posted an 8.0rc4 binary and it is mentioned in the current FAQ,
so yea, I think it works.

Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.

As of 8.0 the spinlock support should be driven by CPU type not OS type,
so as long as you build using a compiler that defines standard CPU
symbols it should work. In particular I'd expect a gcc build on OS/2 to
not have any issues about spinlocks.

Shared libraries are another story --- there is no way we'd build shared
libraries successfully without a Makefile.os2 and some additions to
Makefile.shlib. Given the importance of plpgsql I don't think we could
consider a build with --disable-shared to be a "supported platform".
I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
our CVS source but only with modified source.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman (AT) candle (DOT) pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [PORTS] Warp - 01-09-2005 , 04:06 PM



Bruce Momjian <pgman (AT) candle (DOT) pha.pa.us> writes:
Quote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.

I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
our CVS source but only with modified source.
We don't have a Novell port --- it is not, and should not be, listed as
a "supported platform" if it requires hacking the source.

There may be a Novell port out there, but I don't take any
responsibility for it ;-)

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [PORTS] Warp - 01-09-2005 , 04:08 PM



Tom Lane wrote:
Quote:
Bruce Momjian <pgman (AT) candle (DOT) pha.pa.us> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.

I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
our CVS source but only with modified source.

We don't have a Novell port --- it is not, and should not be, listed as
a "supported platform" if it requires hacking the source.

There may be a Novell port out there, but I don't take any
responsibility for it ;-)
Right, I assume the same for OS/2. It is mentioned in the FAQ and has
a URL. That's as far as we can go until the OS/2 port person submits
information on what changes he had to make to get it to work and we
incorporate his changes in our code.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman (AT) candle (DOT) pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [PORTS] Warp - 01-14-2005 , 08:10 PM



Hi

That would be me doing the OS/2 port.

I was waiting until the GA 8.0 release before I submitted the patches for
the makefiles and code for the os/2 port.

It does support shared libraries, and the spinlock stuff and signals are
provided by the GCC 3.3.5 LIBC.

I have one major issue with character code conversion to resolve in order
to pass the regression tests, as well as a compiler bug that messes up the
printf'ing of long long variables.

Lorne Sunley

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
lsunley (AT) mb (DOT) sympatico.ca
-----------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.