Re: [BUGS] BUG #2683: spi_exec_query in plperl returns column

#1

David Fetter wrote:

Quote:

On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:07:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter <david (AT) fetter (DOT) org> writes:
At some point, we will find something where we will have to duplicate
some large hunk of 5.8's functionality to support 5.6.

No, we won't; we are not in the business of fixing Perl bugs.

My point exactly.

You haven't given any reason why someone who is using 5.6 and is
happy with it shouldn't be able to continue to use it with PG.

In my experience, people aren't "happy with" 5.6. Instead, they've
got a mandate to maintain support for it, and this could be an
argument for upgrading.

Or an argument to dump PostgreSQL.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce (AT) momjian (DOT) us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo (AT) postgresql (DOT) org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2683: spi_exec_query in plperl returns column

mailing.database.pgsql-bugs mailing.database.pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2683: spi_exec_query in plperl returns column - 10-15-2006 , 11:11 PM