(cc'ing -jdbc)

Sergio Lob wrote:

Well, it's working as intended in the sense that there is no code to
support retrieving a real precision value -- it is indeed a hardcoded
placeholder value. I'm not sure why '9' off the top of my head, perhaps
making that column NULL would be better? What are the units of this
value anyway?

If you're willing to do the implementation work to improve this, then
post a patch to pgsql-jdbc and I can look at applying it.

-O

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Oliver Jowett wrote:

Compare the existing implementation of ResultSetMetaData.getPrecision.

Kris Jurka

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq