well, that's fine I suppose -- but then why does it work the other way
for DROP TABLE?
i.e. feels like we're confusing "implementation" and "desired semantics"
adam
Tom Lane wrote:
Quote:
"PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs (AT) postgresql (DOT) org> writes:
==> yikes! in window 2, it should have errored.
Why are you of the opinion that this is a bug? The catalog lookup has
to happen before the second xact can hope to obtain a lock on the table,
no?
regards, tom lane |
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend