We had major problems after migrating the DB to a more powerful server; we
managed to locate the problem to a type conversion bug in our software.
Never the less, this thing puzzles us a lot:

NBTEST2=# select '-1'>'0';
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)

We've tried this query on several servers with different versions of
postgresql and different versions of glibc - some returns true, others
returns false - and it seems neither to be related to the postgresql version
nor the glibc version. At all servers we tested, strcmp("-1","0") returned
negative - at some -3 and at others -1, and not related to postgresql.

The correct result above should be false, since ascii('-')=45 while
ascii('0')=48.

Can the character set in use be significant?

--
Notice of Confidentiality: This email is sent unencrypted over the network,
and may be stored on several email servers; it can be read by third parties
as easy as a postcard. Do not rely on email for confidential information.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

[Tobias Brox - Mon at 12:17:33PM +0200]
Ehr, uncorrelated to the result of the evaluation of '-1'>'0' on postgresql,
I mean.

--
Notice of Confidentiality: This email is sent unencrypted over the network,
and may be stored on several email servers; it can be read by third parties
as easy as a postcard. Do not rely on email for confidential information.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Tobias Brox wrote:

It's more likely to be the locale in use. For example, on my machine,
given a file with -1 and 0.

LANG="C" sort file
-1
0

LANG="en_US" sort file
0
-1

Many locales do a more complicated comparison than ascii values (like
strcmp). For example, symbols and spaces may only be used as tiebreakers
after effectively comparing the strings without them.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

[Stephan Szabo - Mon at 06:07:48AM -0700]
Hah, those Americans don't even know how to count ;-)

I find this weird, but it's clearly not a problem with postgresql at least.
We should obviously check up the locale and stick to "C" on the servers.

Thanks for the effort.

--
Notice of Confidentiality: This email is sent unencrypted over the network,
and may be stored on several email servers; it can be read by third parties
as easy as a postcard. Do not rely on email for confidential information.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo (AT) postgresql (DOT) org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly