![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Postgresql, instead, makes the identifiers in the query lowercase. While |
|
create table "Table" ( id int ); select * from Table; You get "relation table not found". |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tom Lane wrote: See also the example and footnote at the end of section 1.1.1 of our documentation: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/view....AX-IDENTIFIERS (not sure why the link to the footnote doesn't work in that version, but the footnote is at the bottom of the page). There has been some talk of providing an alternate mode in which unquoted identifiers are folded per spec, but this seems likely to break enough code that no one has really wanted to do it. My guess is that we will remain intentionally non compliant on this point forever. Just so we are clear what's at stake here. I am trying to perform a migration to PG-SQL for some company. They already support access, MS-SQL and Oracle, and want to support PG-SQL as well. The problem is that the application is MFC, and CRowSet opens the table double-quoting identifiers. The application itself does not. All databases carry all identifiers in allcaps. As some of the ODBC code is |
|
outside the specific application's control, I cannot tell them to "quote or unquote all statements". This may drop the whole project, which would be a real shame. Documenting this incompatibility is fine as far as it goes, but it does not cover the migration very well. Also something to ponder is this. When I run psql on Debian Sid, and I do: create table "Test" (); select * from table; |
|
The query runs fine! It seems that PG-SQL 7.3.3. on Linux (at least the Debian version) treats unquoted as case independant. Am I missing something? Why can't I set a "compatibility" flag for the DB? |
#4
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Tom Lane wrote: See also the example and footnote at the end of section 1.1.1 of our documentation: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/view....AX-IDENTIFIERS (not sure why the link to the footnote doesn't work in that version, but the footnote is at the bottom of the page). There has been some talk of providing an alternate mode in which unquoted identifiers are folded per spec, but this seems likely to break enough code that no one has really wanted to do it. My guess is that we will remain intentionally non compliant on this point forever. Just so we are clear what's at stake here. I am trying to perform a migration to PG-SQL for some company. They already support access, MS-SQL and Oracle, and want to support PG-SQL as well. The problem is that the application is MFC, and CRowSet opens the table double-quoting identifiers. The application itself does not. All databases carry all identifiers in allcaps. As some of the ODBC code is Do you mean that the names are always allcaps like FOO? That would certainly show the incompatibility case, yeah. That's how the app doesn't care whether its queries are quoted or not. |
|
outside the specific application's control, I cannot tell them to "quote or unquote all statements". This may drop the whole project, which would be a real shame. Documenting this incompatibility is fine as far as it goes, but it does not cover the migration very well. Also something to ponder is this. When I run psql on Debian Sid, and I do: create table "Test" (); select * from table; Do you mean Test here? Yes, I did. Sorry. |
|
I'd wonder if you had a test table already defined, I can't reproduce on my 7.3.x box under redhat. Neither can I, now. I guess it was something basic I missed when filing |
|
The query runs fine! It seems that PG-SQL 7.3.3. on Linux (at least the Debian version) treats unquoted as case independant. Am I missing something? Why can't I set a "compatibility" flag for the DB? As Tom said, noone's wanted to go through and find all the things that giving an uppercase folding option would break. For example, fairly quickly after simply making the case folding go the other way for identifiers, initdb breaks. It'd probably require someone who had the time and interest in changing it and fixing all the breakage and probably some work from then on making sure that it stays working. I'm willing to give it a go, but I'm going to need a few pointers. I |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |