![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2317 Logged by: TomasKlockar Email address: tomask (AT) omicron (DOT) se PostgreSQL version: 7.3.2/7.4.7 Operating system: linux(fedora) Description: Wrong sorting order for (VW) Details: SELECT cname FROM clients ORDER BY cname; sorts W before V and that is a mistake. the result is V W WHI Vi Wi Volvo Correct order would be to place all vV before all wW. I think the database was initialized with UTF8 but it might have been ISO_8859-1, however the error is easily repeatable and ill be happy to provide a dump. I tested this on 7.3.2 and 7.4.7 and the error was repeatable. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I think the database was initialized with UTF8 but it might have been ISO_8859-1, however the error is easily repeatable and ill be happy to provide a dump. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2317 Logged by: TomasKlockar Email address: tomask (AT) omicron (DOT) se PostgreSQL version: 7.3.2/7.4.7 Operating system: linux(fedora) Description: Wrong sorting order for (VW) Details: SELECT cname FROM clients ORDER BY cname; sorts W before V and that is a mistake. the result is V W WHI Vi Wi Volvo Correct order would be to place all vV before all wW. I think the database was initialized with UTF8 but it might=20 have been=20 ISO_8859-1, however the error is easily repeatable and ill=20 be happy to=20 provide a dump. I tested this on 7.3.2 and 7.4.7 and the error was repeatable. =20 I think the most important thing we'd need to know is what=20 locale the database was initialized with in order to try to reproduce. =20 If you put similar data in a file and use the unix "sort"=20 command with the same locale, do you get the same order? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
The following bug has been logged online: =20=09=09=09 Bug reference: 2317 Logged by: TomasKlockar Email address: tomask (AT) omicron (DOT) se PostgreSQL version: 7.3.2/7.4.7 Operating system: linux(fedora) Description: Wrong sorting order for (VW) Details: =20=09=09=09 SELECT cname FROM clients ORDER BY cname; =20=09=09=09 sorts W before V and that is a mistake. =20=09=09=09 the result is =20=09=09=09 V W WHI Vi Wi Volvo =20=09=09=09 Correct order would be to place all vV=20 before all wW. =20=09=09=09 I think the database was initialized=20 with UTF8 but it might=20 =20=09=09=09=20=20=20=20=20=20 =20 have been=20 =20=09=09=20=20=20=20 =20 ISO_8859-1, however the error is easily=20 repeatable and ill=20 =20=09=09=09=20=20=20=20=20=20 =20 be happy to=20 =20=09=09=20=20=20=20 =20 provide a dump. =20=09=09=09 I tested this on 7.3.2 and 7.4.7 and=20 the error was repeatable. =20=09=09=09=20=20=20=20=20=20 =20 I think the most important thing we'd need to=20 know is what=20 locale the database was initialized with in=20 order to try to reproduce. =20=09=09 If you put similar data in a file and use the=20 unix "sort"=20 command with the same locale, do you get the same order? =20=09=09=20=20=20=20 =20 =20=09 That looks like the typical swedish locale, which sorts=20 V and W as the same character. Yes, that can be very annoying for some=20 of us :-), but that's the way it's defined. =20=09 //Magnus =20=09=20=20 =20 I would say that sorting V and W as the same character may=20 work in a dictionary or sometimes when sorting names, however=20 in that case why don't it sort C and K as the same character?=20 and in some cases C and S as the same.=20 =20 The best sorting algorithm should sort all characters as=20 separate characters, and if you want fancy sorting you should=20 need to turn it on for a table. =20 Fancy sorting, like sorting Carlsson and Karlsson together=20 since they are equal in the same way as=20 Viktor=3DWiktor=3DVictor=3DWictor. Cesar and Sesar would also have=20 to be sorted together since they are pronounced the same in=20 swedish, and if you look in a phonebook you would find them=20 at the same place. =20 Now I get the english words was and vas sorted together when=20 I need them separated. =20 Currently the sortingfunction in postgreSQL have disqualified=20 itself from beeing used, and I do the sorting in java which=20 treat them as separate caracters. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
I would say that sorting V and W as the same character may work in a=20 dictionary [...] Currently the sortingfunction in postgreSQL have disqualified itself=20 from beeing used, and I do the sorting in java which treat them as=20 separate caracters. =20 This is my 5 cent, |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |