dbTalk Databases Forums  

[ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host

mailing.database.pgsql-admin mailing.database.pgsql-admin


Discuss [ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host in the mailing.database.pgsql-admin forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Kevin Kempter
 
Posts: n/a

Default [ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host - 04-25-2012 , 11:39 PM






Hi all;

I've setup PostgreSQL to talk across servers thousand of times... not
sure what I'm doing wrong, maybe I'm just over-tired.


I have 2 scientific linux VM's running in vmware workstation

server 1 - 192.168.1.125
server 2 - 192.168.1.127

I've disabled selinux on both servers

Ive instaled PostgreSQL 9.1.3 on both servers

I have listen_addresses on server 1 set to '*'

postgres=# show listen_addresses ;
listen_addresses
------------------
*
(1 row)


I've added this to the pg_hba.conf file of server 1:
host all all 192.168.1.0/24 trust


I can scp files between the servers

Then from server 2 I run this:

$ psql -h 192.168.1.125
psql: could not connect to server: No route to host
Is the server running on host "192.168.1.125" and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432?


am i loosing my mind?


thanks in advance

--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin (AT) postgresql (DOT) org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host - 04-25-2012 , 11:50 PM






Kevin Kempter <cs_dba (AT) consistentstate (DOT) com> writes:
Quote:
I can scp files between the servers
Really?

Quote:
$ psql -h 192.168.1.125
psql: could not connect to server: No route to host
Because that is not a Postgres problem, that is a network connectivity
problem. I'd bet that there's something wrong with the VM
configuration, such that the VM host isn't connecting 192.168.1.* in one
VM to 192.168.1.* in the other.

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin (AT) postgresql (DOT) org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Matheus de Oliveira
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host - 04-26-2012 , 06:29 AM



On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl (AT) sss (DOT) pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Quote:
Kevin Kempter <cs_dba (AT) consistentstate (DOT) com> writes:
I can scp files between the servers

Really?

$ psql -h 192.168.1.125
psql: could not connect to server: No route to host

Because that is not a Postgres problem, that is a network connectivity
problem. I'd bet that there's something wrong with the VM
configuration, such that the VM host isn't connecting 192.168.1.* in one
VM to 192.168.1.* in the other.

regards, tom lane


Or the port is not 5432. Or a Firewall is blocking the connection.

--
Matheus de Oliveira

Bacharelado em Ciências de Computação
Laboratório de Computação de Alto Desempenho -
LCAD<http://www.lcad.icmc.usp.br/>
Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação -
ICMC<http://www.icmc.usp.br/>
Universidade de São Paulo - USP <http://www.sc.usp.br/>

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Ricardo Benatti
 
Posts: n/a

Default Fwd: [ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host - 04-26-2012 , 06:49 AM



the port is listening in VM ?

netstat -nat
Quote:
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
State
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 <http://0.0.0.0/> 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:3350 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:631 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
*tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5432 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN *


released access [ postgresql.conf ] for connections tcp ??

# - Connection Settings -
Quote:
#listen_addresses = '*' # what IP address(es) to listen on;
# comma-separated list of
addresses;
*# defaults to 'localhost', '*' =
all*
# (change requires restart)
port = 5432 # (change requires restart)
max_connections = 100 # (change requires restart)


your network is configured in: pg_hba.conf


# IPv4 local connections:
Quote:
host all all 127.0.0.1/32 trust
host all all 192.168.0.0/16 trust


Hope this help.

*Ricardo Benatti
*




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kevin Kempter <cs_dba (AT) consistentstate (DOT) com>
Date: Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:39 AM
Subject: [ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host
To: pgsql-admin (AT) postgresql (DOT) org


Hi all;

I've setup PostgreSQL to talk across servers thousand of times... not sure
what I'm doing wrong, maybe I'm just over-tired.


I have 2 scientific linux VM's running in vmware workstation

server 1 - 192.168.1.125
server 2 - 192.168.1.127

I've disabled selinux on both servers

Ive instaled PostgreSQL 9.1.3 on both servers

I have listen_addresses on server 1 set to '*'

postgres=# show listen_addresses ;
listen_addresses
------------------
*
(1 row)


I've added this to the pg_hba.conf file of server 1:
host all all 192.168.1.0/24 trust


I can scp files between the servers

Then from server 2 I run this:

$ psql -h 192.168.1.125
psql: could not connect to server: No route to host
Is the server running on host "192.168.1.125" and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432?


am i loosing my mind?


thanks in advance

--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin (AT) postgresql (DOT) org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/**mailpref/pgsql-admin<http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin>

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Kevin Kempter
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host - 04-26-2012 , 10:36 AM



On 04/25/2012 10:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Quote:
Kevin Kempter<cs_dba (AT) consistentstate (DOT) com> writes:
I can scp files between the servers
Really?

$ psql -h 192.168.1.125
psql: could not connect to server: No route to host
Because that is not a Postgres problem, that is a network connectivity
problem. I'd bet that there's something wrong with the VM
configuration, such that the VM host isn't connecting 192.168.1.* in one
VM to 192.168.1.* in the other.

regards, tom lane
Scientific Linux turns on the firewall by default. It lets me scp via
username & passwd but wouldn't allow the port 5432 tcp connection till I
disabled it. I like Scientific because it seems that they are a large
team and as a project seem to have better long term viability than other
RH based projects but a couple of their defaults drive me nuts. Like
this one, and the default install of yum-autoupdate




--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin (AT) postgresql (DOT) org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Frank Lanitz
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [ADMIN] psql: could not connect to server: No route to host - 04-27-2012 , 04:44 AM



Am 26.04.2012 17:36, schrieb Kevin Kempter:
Quote:
Scientific Linux turns on the firewall by default. It lets me scp via
username & passwd but wouldn't allow the port 5432 tcp connection till I
disabled it. I like Scientific because it seems that they are a large
team and as a project seem to have better long term viability than other
RH based projects but a couple of their defaults drive me nuts. Like
this one, and the default install of yum-autoupdate
At least for the driving nuts thing I'm 110% on your page

cheers,
Frank

--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin (AT) postgresql (DOT) org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.