![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, Is it possible to put mysqlpp::Connection * con in a class (and a .h) ? |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
P.S. Please do not email me directly. Keep this thread on the mailing list. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
could it be changed so that Reply goes to the list, rather than the author? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
People think, "Oh, Warren maintains this thing, so he must know the most about it, so I'll send it to him." |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Earl Miles wrote: could it be changed so that Reply goes to the list, rather than the author? This is an ancient battle, and those on either side are pretty well entrenched. Here's the opposing position: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Besides, I don't think that most of the personal email traffic I get is due to this. People think, "Oh, Warren maintains this thing, so he must know the most about it, so I'll send it to him." The sentiment may be true, or may not, but that's beside the point. The purpose of the mailing list is to raise all boats, not free tech support. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ok, that's one of the more arrogant arguments I've ever read, |
|
it does convince me to no longer bother to delete the extra address when I hit reply-to, causing the author to get a double copy of the message. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Earl Miles wrote: Ok, that's one of the more arrogant arguments I've ever read, It doesn't matter what you think of the argument, many people out there hold it. FWIW, the author of that would probably think it arrogant to hold your position, too. Point is, it's a touchy issue. |
|
it does convince me to no longer bother to delete the extra address when I hit reply-to, causing the author to get a double copy of the message. ?? That's one of the things I _don't_ want. Decide who you want to respond to: the list, or to the original poster, but never both; and prefer the list. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |