![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
What are people doing for backups on very large MySQL/InnoDB databases? Say for databases greater than 200 GB. Curious about the backup methods, procedures, and frequency. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
What are people doing for backups on very large MySQL/InnoDB databases? Say for databases greater than 200 GB. Curious about the backup=20 methods, procedures, and frequency. |
#4
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
On Sunday, 7 May 2006 at 9:27:31 -0700, Robert DiFalco wrote: What are people doing for backups on very large MySQL/InnoDB databases? Say for databases greater than 200 GB. Curious about the backup methods, procedures, and frequency. A second question, but not for the first time: how would you *like* to do backups if you had the choice? We're currently in the final stages of the design of an online backup solution, and in the near future I'll publish the specs. I won't mention them now to avoid influencing you, but now's the time to speak up if you want something specific. |
|
I would suggest looking at the functionality of Microsoft SQL Server or Sybase backups. It's extremely nice from an admin point of view, and certainly covers all of what Robert mentions. |
|
Fast, incremental, compressed, and no max-size limitations. Must be transaction safe; able to run while transactions are going on without including any started after the backup began; the usual stuff. |
|
On 5/8/06, David Hillman wrote: On May 7, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Robert DiFalco wrote: Fast, incremental, compressed, and no max-size limitations. Must be transaction safe; able to run while transactions are going on without including any started after the backup began; the usual stuff. Incremental, transaction safe, compressed, fast, no-max-size. ( In order ) Those are certainly the most important features (and I'll be glad to beta-test it I'll add: manage multiple servers, deal withreplication (using the replicated server as a backup would be cool), manage binlogs (date and purge) and be compatible with version 4.1 and above (I don't plan on using the 5 version any time soon). |
|
In addition, I'd like to see a configurable option for how often to take a full and or incremental backups, a mechanism to age the backups and drop them after a certain amount of time. For example, I want a simple way to keep four weekly near line backups each month, then age off and keep one backup for each of the previous 11 months, and then just one backup per year. This would be about 1T of data for us. |
|
Hi Greg, Maybe similar features to that of bacula (my current backup software of choice for my wifes business servers). This is a very comprehensive open source solution that has many of the features requested below. eg. multiple servers, pooling, aging etc. It is a good example of what my own requirements would be. |
|
Is the intention to have a MySQL type plugin? eg. will it have an api that will be open to other backup solutions being able to utilise what will be written? |
|
It would be nice to be able to utilise a standard XBSA solution giving access to the database from any one of the major enterprise backup solutions, eg. Legato Networker, Veritas Netbackup, HP Dataprotector etc. etc. This would allow an enormously simple and straightforward integration into many of the existing corporate solutions that exist around the world. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |