![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a need for a database and/or software development environment that 1) can be learned reasonably quickly by intelligent people with no prior experience setting up databases or using programming languages 2) can be set up on a single Windows box 3) need not be multi-user (although preferable) 4) Allows for multiple tables/files, data entry into the tables, and subsequent queries on data from more than one at a time (e.g. joins) without direct specification of SQL statements. 5) need not scale for large numbers of tables, rows, columns Access would fit the requirements (for what I need. Can you think of any other database/software development environments for use in place of Access? Thanks. --dawn |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a need for a database and/or software development environment that 1) can be learned reasonably quickly by intelligent people with no prior experience setting up databases or using programming languages 2) can be set up on a single Windows box 3) need not be multi-user (although preferable) 4) Allows for multiple tables/files, data entry into the tables, and subsequent queries on data from more than one at a time (e.g. joins) without direct specification of SQL statements. 5) need not scale for large numbers of tables, rows, columns Access would fit the requirements (for what I need. Can you think of any other database/software development environments for use in place of Access? Thanks. --dawn |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a need for a database and/or software development environment that 1) can be learned reasonably quickly by intelligent people with no prior experience setting up databases or using programming languages 2) can be set up on a single Windows box 3) need not be multi-user (although preferable) 4) Allows for multiple tables/files, data entry into the tables, and subsequent queries on data from more than one at a time (e.g. joins) without direct specification of SQL statements. 5) need not scale for large numbers of tables, rows, columns Access would fit the requirements (for what I need. Can you think of any other database/software development environments for use in place of Access? Thanks. --dawn |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Dawn, You have to count on Microsoft Visual FoxPro! |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Spider.D" <no (AT) email (DOT) com> wrote in message news:c9892a$kpb$1 (AT) ls219 (DOT) htnet.hr... Hi Dawn, You have to count on Microsoft Visual FoxPro! That's my favorite so far. I might consider Revelation before FoxPro, however. I'd really like to find an open source, spiffy, new (I don't need it for building production apps anyway) product. I'd also prefer non-SQL-based (even if SQL-accessible) but it needs a very intuitive UI, which Approach and FoxPro have -- I don't know about SQLBase (which I'm guessing is SQL-based ;-) but I have been impressed with Gupta products before. So, are there any open source Access replacements (not MySQL or PostreSQL) that have an easy GUI for non-programmers, but smart end-users? Thanks for the suggestions! --dawn |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Spider.D" <no (AT) email (DOT) com> wrote in message news:c9892a$kpb$1 (AT) ls219 (DOT) htnet.hr... Hi Dawn, You have to count on Microsoft Visual FoxPro! That's my favorite so far. I might consider Revelation before FoxPro, |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Not that it's open source, but I forgot to mention Alpha 5. I would stay away from FileMaker. Too hard to use. I would rank Approach first, then Alpha 5, then FoxPro in terms of ease of use. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |