![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, I am preparing an analysis report and need some help. Currently, what is the most efficient / most used way of ensuring global concurrency control / serializability in federated databases/multidatabases ?? Thank you. Shared or shared nothing? What vendor? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"anonym" <doremesa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1160350176.518298.311480 (AT) h48g2000cwc (DOT) googlegroups.com... Hi, I am preparing an analysis report and need some help. Currently, what is the most efficient / most used way of ensuring global concurrency control / serializability in federated databases/multidatabases ?? Thank you. Shared or shared nothing? What vendor? Jim |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
both - distributed and multidatatbase(with no sharing) Thanks. Jim Kennedy wrote: "anonym" <doremesa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1160350176.518298.311480 (AT) h48g2000cwc (DOT) googlegroups.com... Hi, I am preparing an analysis report and need some help. Currently, what is the most efficient / most used way of ensuring global concurrency control / serializability in federated databases/multidatabases ?? Thank you. Shared or shared nothing? What vendor? Jim |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |