![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I need to dissect or know all detail about how data or entry are saved in the above file format. It need to know start and end delimiters for each entries. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ashish.Batajoo (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: [snipped..] |
|
As for the file format, have you checked Microsoft licence ? As far as I know the file format should be property of Microsoft so I can't tell you the delimiters, and even Microsoft will not tell you. I am afraid that even an attempt to discover the file format by trial and error is not legal. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Timothy Madden" <terminatorul (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:458d69bd$0$49196$14726298 (AT) news (DOT) sunsite.dk... Ashish.Batajoo (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: [snipped..] As for the file format, have you checked Microsoft licence ? As far as I know the file format should be property of Microsoft so I can't tell you the delimiters, and even Microsoft will not tell you. I am afraid that even an attempt to discover the file format by trial and error is not legal. Reverse engineering a file format is perfectly legal. Using that file format for your own software, however, would require some licensing, Why? If your first sentence is true then the only intellectual |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"don" <news (AT) southeast-florida (DOT) com> wrote: "Timothy Madden" <terminatorul (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:458d69bd$0$49196$14726298 (AT) news (DOT) sunsite.dk... Ashish.Batajoo (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: [snipped..] As for the file format, have you checked Microsoft licence ? As far as I know the file format should be property of Microsoft so I can't tell you the delimiters, and even Microsoft will not tell you. I am afraid that even an attempt to discover the file format by trial and error is not legal. Reverse engineering a file format is perfectly legal. Using that file format for your own software, however, would require some licensing, Why? If your first sentence is true then the only intellectual property protection that Microsoft has is a patent or a copyright. |
|
Both require the disclosure of the file format which Microsoft has not done. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
David Segall wrote: "don" <news (AT) southeast-florida (DOT) com> wrote: "Timothy Madden" <terminatorul (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:458d69bd$0$49196$14726298 (AT) news (DOT) sunsite.dk... Ashish.Batajoo (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: [snipped..] As for the file format, have you checked Microsoft licence ? As far as I know the file format should be property of Microsoft so I can't tell you the delimiters, and even Microsoft will not tell you. I am afraid that even an attempt to discover the file format by trial and error is not legal. Reverse engineering a file format is perfectly legal. Using that file format for your own software, however, would require some licensing, Why? If your first sentence is true then the only intellectual property protection that Microsoft has is a patent or a copyright. Is that not so? IANAL, but has not the enforceability of a typical EULA - "Because we say so" - long been in question? And can such an agreement bind a third party anyway? Both require the disclosure of the file format which Microsoft has not done. Prior to DMCA - which was of course lobbied for to close the loophole - isn't don correct that reverse engineering would be clearly legal? I think we agree Toby. I don't know if reverse engineering of an |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"toby" <toby (AT) telegraphics (DOT) com.au> wrote: David Segall wrote: "don" <news (AT) southeast-florida (DOT) com> wrote: "Timothy Madden" <terminatorul (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:458d69bd$0$49196$14726298 (AT) news (DOT) sunsite.dk... Ashish.Batajoo (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: [snipped..] As for the file format, have you checked Microsoft licence ? As far as I know the file format should be property of Microsoft so I can't tell you the delimiters, and even Microsoft will not tell you. I am afraid that even an attempt to discover the file format by trial and error is not legal. Reverse engineering a file format is perfectly legal. Using that file format for your own software, however, would require some licensing, Why? If your first sentence is true then the only intellectual property protection that Microsoft has is a patent or a copyright. Is that not so? IANAL, but has not the enforceability of a typical EULA - "Because we say so" - long been in question? And can such an agreement bind a third party anyway? Both require the disclosure of the file format which Microsoft has not done. Prior to DMCA - which was of course lobbied for to close the loophole - isn't don correct that reverse engineering would be clearly legal? I think we agree Toby. I don't know if reverse engineering of an Access database is illegal in the United States which is why I included the caveat in my post. The End User License Agreement is irrelevant since Microsoft do not restrict the distribution of an Access database. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |