![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi all, I'm trying to do some estimations for an application we're about to build. And I'm not quite sure if the numbers of records we're facing can be handeled at all. We've got 3 critical tables with really a lot of records to be stored... The tables are fairly simple with between 3 to 10 columns but our calculations gave that Table 1 has to store 96 billion records of arround 60bytes each, Table 2 has to store 1.2 billion records of arround 150 bytes each and Table 3 has to store 32 billion records of arround 32 bytes each. This all summs up to arround 7 TeraBytes of data without any indices counted yet. We guess that from the moment the application is operational there will be an average of 350 insert and 150 update statements (transactions) per second. Can this kind of dataload be handeled by todays database servers? Will the amount of insert and update transactions be possible? Or are we way out of scale? Is this allready in a dimension where clustering is needed? Or can this still be done by a single machine? Thanx a lof for you answers in advance! Dom. Yes, there are vendor's that can handle that volume. Call the major vendors |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi all, I'm trying to do some estimations for an application we're about to build. ... Table 1 has to store 96 billion records of arround 60bytes each, Table 2 has to store 1.2 billion records of arround 150 bytes each and Table 3 has to store 32 billion records of arround 32 bytes each. This all summs up to arround 7 TeraBytes of data without any indices counted yet. We guess that from the moment the application is operational there will be an average of 350 insert and 150 update statements (transactions) per second. Can this kind of dataload be handeled by todays database servers? |
|
Will the amount of insert and update transactions be possible? Or are we way out of scale? Is this allready in a dimension where clustering is needed? Or can this still be done by a single machine? Thanx a lof for you answers in advance! Dom. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |