VFP 9: Outlook Automation Problem

#41

"Dan Freeman" <spam (AT) microsoft (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

I see you're concatenating (possibly) many email addresses. Could you be
outrunning OL97's capacity there?

No, since I was only testing with one E-mail address per E-mail.

Quote:

This is truly a guess. I don't know. Have you tried sending one-offs?

Yes. They work. Multiple E-mails in quick succession might be
the cause.

I have decided to deploy it anyway. I hope that it is simply the
very old Outlook that I have that has the problems.

Quote:

(And why aren't you using BCC for this kind of spam? <g>)

What spam? These are invoices, statements, and reports to
clients.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.

#42

"Dan Freeman" <spam (AT) microsoft (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

I see you're concatenating (possibly) many email addresses. Could you be
outrunning OL97's capacity there?

No, since I was only testing with one E-mail address per E-mail.

Quote:

This is truly a guess. I don't know. Have you tried sending one-offs?

Yes. They work. Multiple E-mails in quick succession might be
the cause.

I have decided to deploy it anyway. I hope that it is simply the
very old Outlook that I have that has the problems.

Quote:

(And why aren't you using BCC for this kind of spam? <g>)

What spam? These are invoices, statements, and reports to
clients.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.

#43

"Dan Freeman" <spam (AT) microsoft (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

I see you're concatenating (possibly) many email addresses. Could you be
outrunning OL97's capacity there?

No, since I was only testing with one E-mail address per E-mail.

Quote:

This is truly a guess. I don't know. Have you tried sending one-offs?

Yes. They work. Multiple E-mails in quick succession might be
the cause.

I have decided to deploy it anyway. I hope that it is simply the
very old Outlook that I have that has the problems.

Quote:

(And why aren't you using BCC for this kind of spam? <g>)

What spam? These are invoices, statements, and reports to
clients.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.

#44

"Dan Freeman" <spam (AT) microsoft (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

I see you're concatenating (possibly) many email addresses. Could you be
outrunning OL97's capacity there?

No, since I was only testing with one E-mail address per E-mail.

Quote:

This is truly a guess. I don't know. Have you tried sending one-offs?

Yes. They work. Multiple E-mails in quick succession might be
the cause.

I have decided to deploy it anyway. I hope that it is simply the
very old Outlook that I have that has the problems.

Quote:

(And why aren't you using BCC for this kind of spam? <g>)

What spam? These are invoices, statements, and reports to
clients.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.

#45

"Dan Freeman" <spam (AT) microsoft (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

I see you're concatenating (possibly) many email addresses. Could you be
outrunning OL97's capacity there?

No, since I was only testing with one E-mail address per E-mail.

Quote:

This is truly a guess. I don't know. Have you tried sending one-offs?

Yes. They work. Multiple E-mails in quick succession might be
the cause.

I have decided to deploy it anyway. I hope that it is simply the
very old Outlook that I have that has the problems.

Quote:

(And why aren't you using BCC for this kind of spam? <g>)

What spam? These are invoices, statements, and reports to
clients.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.

#46

"Dan Freeman" <spam (AT) microsoft (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

I see you're concatenating (possibly) many email addresses. Could you be
outrunning OL97's capacity there?

No, since I was only testing with one E-mail address per E-mail.

Quote:

This is truly a guess. I don't know. Have you tried sending one-offs?

Yes. They work. Multiple E-mails in quick succession might be
the cause.

I have decided to deploy it anyway. I hope that it is simply the
very old Outlook that I have that has the problems.

Quote:

(And why aren't you using BCC for this kind of spam? <g>)

What spam? These are invoices, statements, and reports to
clients.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

VFP 9: Outlook Automation Problem

comp.databases.xbase.fox comp.databases.xbase.fox

Re: VFP 9: Outlook Automation Problem - 02-04-2008 , 12:27 AM

Re: VFP 9: Outlook Automation Problem - 02-04-2008 , 12:27 AM

Re: VFP 9: Outlook Automation Problem - 02-04-2008 , 12:27 AM

Re: VFP 9: Outlook Automation Problem - 02-04-2008 , 12:27 AM

Re: VFP 9: Outlook Automation Problem - 02-04-2008 , 12:27 AM

Re: VFP 9: Outlook Automation Problem - 02-04-2008 , 12:27 AM