Is there anyone who has some experience with moving from Flagship to
VFP 9 ? Your comments would be very welcome.

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote:

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote:

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote:

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote:

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote:

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote:

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote:

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote:

Looks like it's a lot like FPW to VFP conversion -- can be done -- best to
re-write tho.

Use hte existing code as "highly detailed pseudo code" for the VFP version.

I've made a living on xBase (dbaseII, dbaseIII, FPD/FPW/FoxPro, etc)
I think spending your time & energy to go to a different (with a future)
platform is a wiser choice.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT), ernyd <ernest (AT) colis (DOT) com> wrote: