![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I wrote my app using .valid() code. Later, I read here that .lostfocus() is better. Since I am now adjusting that part of the app, I wish to review this decision. Big plus to using .lostfocus(): .setfocus() is not valid in .valid() but is in .lostfocus(). If I simply change the .valid()s to .lostfocus()s, what am I going to lose? I know that I will lose returning a non-zero value to determine how many controls forward or back to move, but I do not use that anyway. Is there any other gotcha waiting to sink its teeth into me? Sincerely, Gene Wirchekno Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is there any other gotcha waiting to sink its teeth into me? |
|
I wrote my app using .valid() code. Later, I read here that .lostfocus() is better. Since I am now adjusting that part of the app, I wish to review this decision. Big plus to using .lostfocus(): .setfocus() is not valid in .valid() but is in .lostfocus(). If I simply change the .valid()s to .lostfocus()s, what am I going to lose? I know that I will lose returning a non-zero value to determine how many controls forward or back to move, but I do not use that anyway. Is there any other gotcha waiting to sink its teeth into me? Sincerely, Gene Wirchekno Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |