![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
It's time for me to ask another dumb question. The term "data sublanguage" appears in Codd's 1970 paper. I kind of glossed over it when I first read it, figuring that my intuitive grasp was close enough. Now I'm wondering whether I really know what "data sublanguage" means, at all. What is a "data sublanguage"? What is the difference between a "sublanguage" and a "language"? Can a programming language embed a data sublanguage as a subset of the syntax and semantics of the programming language? Does the data sublanguage Codd was referring to span all the syntax and semantics of the relational data model? Did SQL take the place of the data sublanguage Codd was suggesting should be built? Have Date & Darwen or others created a relational data sublanguage? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2007-12-18 11:19:57 -0500, "David Cressey" <cressey73 (AT) verizon (DOT) net said: Do you have Date's book An Introduction to Database Systems? It seems to have all the answers to all of your questions. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Kira Yamato" <kirakun (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote in message news:2007121812033875249-kirakun (AT) earthlinknet (DOT) .. On 2007-12-18 11:19:57 -0500, "David Cressey" <cressey73 (AT) verizon (DOT) net said: Do you have Date's book An Introduction to Database Systems? It seems to have all the answers to all of your questions. The term sublanguage has always sat awkwardly with me too, so I have just glanced at the above-named book again, but I can't find the term "sublanguage" in the index. It doesn't appear in Date's Relational Database Dictionary either. Perhaps you could give a page reference? If SQL is a sublanguage, then it might be to language what a subhuman is to a human. ;-) Roy |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
It's time for me to ask another dumb question. The term "data sublanguage" appears in Codd's 1970 paper. I kind of glossed over it when I first read it, figuring that my intuitive grasp was close enough. Now I'm wondering whether I really know what "data sublanguage" means, at all. What is a "data sublanguage"? What is the difference between a "sublanguage" and a "language"? Can a programming language embed a data sublanguage as a subset of the syntax and semantics of the programming language? Does the data sublanguage Codd was referring to span all the syntax and semantics of the relational data model? Did SQL take the place of the data sublanguage Codd was suggesting should be built? Have Date & Darwen or others created a relational data sublanguage? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
It's time for me to ask another dumb question. The term "data sublanguage" appears in Codd's 1970 paper. I kind of glossed over it when I first read it, figuring that my intuitive grasp was close enough. Now I'm wondering whether I really know what "data sublanguage" means, at all. What is a "data sublanguage"? What is the difference between a "sublanguage" and a "language"? Can a programming language embed a data sublanguage as a subset of the syntax and semantics of the programming language? Does the data sublanguage Codd was referring to span all the syntax and semantics of the relational data model? Did SQL take the place of the data sublanguage Codd was suggesting should be built? Have Date & Darwen or others created a relational data sublanguage? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |