dbTalk Databases Forums  

Terminology Question: Intention and Extension

comp.databases.theory comp.databases.theory


Discuss Terminology Question: Intention and Extension in the comp.databases.theory forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Rob
 
Posts: n/a

Default Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 12:05 PM






In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM






Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM



Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM



Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM



Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM



Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM



Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM



Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM



Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Terminology Question: Intention and Extension - 04-05-2008 , 01:09 PM



Rob wrote:
Quote:
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and
"extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*.
That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your
*intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
RDBMS delivered to you was the corresponding *extension*. (Kind of
like the definition of something and the thing itself.)

Is this usage (query = intention, response = extension) used today? If
not, what are the common terms used for query and response, and how
are the terms *intention* and *extension* used now?




I never heard 'intention' used that way, but sometimes 'intension'.


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.