![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Bob Badour wrote: As I recall, the Oracle syntax for expressing recursion uses a CONNECT BY clause. Yes, the CONNECT BY clause lets me do this sort of query. Au contraire. If you want to get the IDs that come before or to get the IDs that come after a particular ID, you care only about order. Huh?. As I said before, I don't care about the order. |
|
What, if not implicit order, does the juxtaposition of ID and NEXTID provide? One of them gives me the ID that precede the entry point; the other gives me the ones that follow. |
|
One must ask: What does this implicit order mean? How does it arise in the first place? If a human puts the rows into some order, upon what information does the human base the decisions? Can one represent this information directly? I did not design the data model; I'm just trying to do some queries against it. For my requirements, the order is completely irrelevant. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |