Mark Forums Read

RDBMS vs Map/Reduce

Go Back

comp.databases.theory comp.databases.theory

Reply

#1

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 04:47 PM

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#2

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#3

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#4

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#5

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#6

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#7

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#8

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#9

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

#10

Old

Daniel Pitts

Posts: n/a

Re: RDBMS vs Map/Reduce - 10-17-2008 , 10:40 PM

Daniel Pitts wrote:

Quote:

I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations
on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations.

Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that
I'm just now finding?

Does anyone know if there are any (include DDL) operations that can't
efficiently be put in terms of map/reduce operations?

Thanks,
Daniel.
Never mind. I realized that part of RDBMS involves filtering. I don't

know why I didn't think of it right away, its the most obvious part of
rdbms :-) Must be a Friday :-)

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

Reply With Quote

Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.