A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors viarelationships or programmically?

#31

On Dec 31 2007, 8:47*pm, mAsterdam <mAster... (AT) vrijdag (DOT) org> wrote:

Quote:

Just curious - why call it architecture?

Why call a rose by another other name? Actually you should call Go
"chess". Then say: I'm going to go chess playing!

Quote:

I don't really share your problem though (you got that by now , I'm
sure) - it sounds like a 'forms' problem in your CASE tool,
in casu access.

You're too blase--you must work in the field, LOL.

Quote:

It is 2:45 here, just got back
from a very nice party.

Did you get lucky? Kiss close? Phone number? Flirty look? That's
the order of success (in decreasing order of preference). I prefer to
fly to foreign countries, it's cheap nowadays--for me and my age US
girls are too upscale and expensive--I can get a girl half my age for
a song in a foreign country--but hat's off to you if you can manage in
America.

Quote:

I finally figured it out, and it took me a while: *Access does indeed
allow compound primary keys, relationships between compound keys, and
the like between tables. No problem whatsoever (I generated from
scratch just such a form, so I know it can be done). *

Access++

Is that a new OOP version of Access coming out? Seems like MSFT
changes their paradigm every few years--good for Microsoft Press and
all those "How To" books!

Quote:

Ray, do you mind if I am not interested? Please say no.

[snip]

No.

Quote:

Happy New Year! *I'm going to bed...

Thank you, same 2u :-)

BTW do you mind if I prefer go to chess?

Aha! It's you! You! Now I remember. Go is a lame sport, feeble
minded 'tard. You might as well play tiddlywinks or bridge. Why not
just check into a Pachenko parlour and watch the little metal balls
drop? About as challenging. But chess, ah chess, that's another
story...

Quote:

--
What you see depends on where you stand.

And what did Newton say to Hooke? "I see further because I stand on
the shoulder of giants"--like I do asking this newsgroup, LOL. (It's
been said this was a subtle slight on Hooke, who was a midget, and had
a feud with Newton).

RL

#32

raylopez99 wrote:

Quote:

... Actually you should call Go "chess".
Then say: I'm going to go chess playing!

No. You are confused enough as it is.

#33

On Jan 1, 1:47 am, mAsterdam <mAster... (AT) vrijdag (DOT) org> wrote:

Quote:

[snip]
Have a nice year Gene, Frank, V.J., Jon, Neo, Troy, Reinier, Doug,
Keith, Lynn, rpl, ,Ross, tina, Vladimir, Tegiri, Ed, Alfredo,
Joe, Dawn, Bruce, Brian, Ray, Tony(3x), Bob, Rob, Jim, Eric, Roy,
Kira, Marshall, Larry, Paul (4x), David (BL, Cressey & Portas), Evan,
Cimode, Hugo, Jan, Sybrand & Zorro. It is 2:45 here, just got back
from a very nice party.

Well now my hangover is eased, may I wish you a very happy new year
too, however unimpressed by your collation of Davids as a multi-valued
attribute. Shame on you mAsterdam

Gelukkig nieuwjaar.

#34

JOG <jog (AT) cs (DOT) nott.ac.uk> wrote:

Quote:

On Jan 1, 1:47 am, mAsterdam <mAster... (AT) vrijdag (DOT) org> wrote:
[snip]
Have a nice year Gene, Frank, V.J., Jon, Neo, Troy, Reinier, Doug,
Keith, Lynn, rpl, ,Ross, tina, Vladimir, Tegiri, Ed, Alfredo,
Joe, Dawn, Bruce, Brian, Ray, Tony(3x), Bob, Rob, Jim, Eric, Roy,
Kira, Marshall, Larry, Paul (4x), David (BL, Cressey & Portas), Evan,
Cimode, Hugo, Jan, Sybrand & Zorro. It is 2:45 here, just got back
from a very nice party.

Well now my hangover is eased, may I wish you a very happy new year
too, however unimpressed by your collation of Davids as a multi-valued
attribute. Shame on you mAsterdam

Gelukkig nieuwjaar.

You are confusing a relation with a report.

Happy New Year, All.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors viarelationships or programmically?

comp.databases.theory comp.databases.theory

Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors viarelationships or programmically? - 01-01-2008 , 03:52 PM

Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationshipsor programmically? - 01-01-2008 , 06:57 PM

Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors viarelationships or programmically? - 01-01-2008 , 07:04 PM

Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? - 01-01-2008 , 08:13 PM