Is the party over?

#21

On 16/05/2012 10:26 AM, VTR250 wrote:

Quote:

On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 6:49:03 PM UTC+10, Roy Hann wrote:
I know Usenet has been pretty effectively hobbled if not completely
killed off, but the conversations/squabbles that used to get
aired here on c.d.t. must still go on somewhere.

Where?

Perhaps the twaddleverse or been bloggered!

Quote:

Roy

Hi,

G'day - to just the usual suspects it seems ... barely enough for an
(admissable) line up ... and I guess not a Gen Y/Millenial within cooee?

Quote:

This is not one of my core Usenet forums, so I haven't picked up on this post for a week.

.... or more than several months in my case. Times are changing it seems.

Cheers, Frank.

#22

On May 15, 7:26*pm, VTR250 <goo... (AT) m-streeter (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:

On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 6:49:03 PM UTC+10, Roy Hann wrote:
I know Usenet has been pretty effectively hobbled if not completely
killed off, but the conversations/squabbles that used to get
aired here on c.d.t. must still go on somewhere.

Where?

--
Roy

Hi,

This is not one of my core Usenet forums, so I haven't picked up on this post for a week. *I don't think the conversations have gone anywhere. *Some tech queries might be put out to Oracle groups like 'Ask Tom' or 'Stack Overflow' etc.

I think Usenet has been harmed by Google a bit because Google Reader doesn't handle threads like a real news reader.

Next time I post a question/answer I will make a reference to helpful information I got from Usenet (YOU!). *Perhaps this will alert some people to Usenet. *Perhaps you might try this too?
What is another way to write one and zero? One and zero are also

written as 1 and 0. This is helpful information from Usenet
(Musatov!).

#23

On May 17, 8:08*am, Frank Hamersley <terabitemigh... (AT) bigpond (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

On 16/05/2012 10:26 AM, VTR250 wrote:

On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 6:49:03 PM UTC+10, Roy Hann wrote:
I know Usenet has been pretty effectively hobbled if not completely
killed off, but the conversations/squabbles that used to get
aired here on c.d.t. must still go on somewhere.

Where?
following a ? Is an inquiry
Perhaps the twaddleverse or been bloggered!

Roy

Hi,

G'day - to just the usual suspects it seems ... barely enough for an
(admissable) line up ... and I guess not a Gen Y/Millenial within cooee?

This is not one of my core Usenet forums, so I haven't picked up on this post for a week.

... or more than several months in my case. Times are changing it seems.

Cheers, Frank.

#24

On May 17, 8:08*am, Frank Hamersley <terabitemigh... (AT) bigpond (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:

On 16/05/2012 10:26 AM, VTR250 wrote:

On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 6:49:03 PM UTC+10, Roy Hann wrote:
I know Usenet has been pretty effectively hobbled if not completely
killed off, but the conversations/squabbles that used to get
aired here on c.d.t. must still go on somewhere.

Where?

Perhaps the twaddleverse or been bloggered!

Roy

Hi,

G'day - to just the usual suspects it seems ... barely enough for an
(admissable) line up ... and I guess not a Gen Y/Millenial within cooee?
I am a prime generalization.

This is not one of my core Usenet forums, so I haven't picked up on this post for a week.

... or more than several months in my case. Times are changing it seems.

Cheers, Frank.
Musatov (Bemis) of implied meaning

#25

Quote:

Where?

dbforums.com maybe. Sadly the discussion in the "Concepts and Design" forum
only rarely gets more interesting than homework questions.

David

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Is the party over?

comp.databases.theory comp.databases.theory

Re: Is the party over? - 05-17-2012 , 08:08 AM

Re: Is the party over? - 07-12-2012 , 06:29 PM

Re: Is the party over? - 07-12-2012 , 06:30 PM

Re: Is the party over? - 07-12-2012 , 06:32 PM

Re: Is the party over? - 07-14-2012 , 05:01 AM