dbTalk Databases Forums  

Objectified Relational Mapping

comp.databases.theory comp.databases.theory


Discuss Objectified Relational Mapping in the comp.databases.theory forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Objectified Relational Mapping - 06-12-2008 , 11:11 AM






Evan Keel wrote:
Quote:
"Evan Keel" <evankeel (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:I6e3k.7321$mh5.3082 (AT) nlpi067 (DOT) nbdc.sbc.com...
What the hell is objectivied relational mapping? Can anyone point me to
references? I've Googled, but nothing. My client insists that the db act
as
an object broker. What does this mean?
Thanks in advance...

Evan



Thanks for the responses. UGH!. I have turned down the project.

Evan



Run, don't walk!


I have the impression that some or all of the original motivation for
the 'object broker' movement had to do with physical problems, such as a
desire for remote execution. Also that much of the delay in bringing
out the 'open-source' mozilla, eg., firefox, had to do with
underestimating the effort to give it a portable programming interface.
(I saw a couple of projects go awry because they assumed one or two
developers could take care of all portability issues.) Interested to
hear comments, especially as to how this movement might pertain to db
engines.


Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old   
paul c
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Objectified Relational Mapping - 06-12-2008 , 11:11 AM






Evan Keel wrote:
Quote:
"Evan Keel" <evankeel (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:I6e3k.7321$mh5.3082 (AT) nlpi067 (DOT) nbdc.sbc.com...
What the hell is objectivied relational mapping? Can anyone point me to
references? I've Googled, but nothing. My client insists that the db act
as
an object broker. What does this mean?
Thanks in advance...

Evan



Thanks for the responses. UGH!. I have turned down the project.

Evan



Run, don't walk!


I have the impression that some or all of the original motivation for
the 'object broker' movement had to do with physical problems, such as a
desire for remote execution. Also that much of the delay in bringing
out the 'open-source' mozilla, eg., firefox, had to do with
underestimating the effort to give it a portable programming interface.
(I saw a couple of projects go awry because they assumed one or two
developers could take care of all portability issues.) Interested to
hear comments, especially as to how this movement might pertain to db
engines.


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.