dbTalk Databases Forums  

Normalizing Tree Data

Go Back dbTalk Databases Forums Databases comp.databases.theory Normalizing Tree Data

comp.databases.theory comp.databases.theory


Discuss Normalizing Tree Data in the comp.databases.theory forum.



Reply
Page 10 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old   
David Cressey
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 08:22 AM






"cr113" <cr113 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

Quote:
Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.
What is ugly about SQL joins? Why are fnction calls not ugly?




Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old   
David Cressey
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 08:22 AM






"cr113" <cr113 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

Quote:
Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.
What is ugly about SQL joins? Why are fnction calls not ugly?




Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old   
David Cressey
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 08:22 AM



"cr113" <cr113 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

Quote:
Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.
What is ugly about SQL joins? Why are fnction calls not ugly?




Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old   
David Cressey
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 08:22 AM



"cr113" <cr113 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

Quote:
Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.
What is ugly about SQL joins? Why are fnction calls not ugly?




Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old   
cr113
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 04:15 PM


On Feb 12, 8:22*am, "David Cressey" <cresse... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:
Quote:
"cr113" <cr... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:a6634bec-eda0-477b-b93b-e2f6fe949e53 (AT) e23g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

*Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.

What is ugly about SQL joins? *Why are fnction calls not ugly?
OOPs. Wrong newsgroup.


Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old   
cr113
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 04:15 PM


On Feb 12, 8:22*am, "David Cressey" <cresse... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:
Quote:
"cr113" <cr... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:a6634bec-eda0-477b-b93b-e2f6fe949e53 (AT) e23g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

*Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.

What is ugly about SQL joins? *Why are fnction calls not ugly?
OOPs. Wrong newsgroup.


Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old   
cr113
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 04:15 PM


On Feb 12, 8:22*am, "David Cressey" <cresse... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:
Quote:
"cr113" <cr... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:a6634bec-eda0-477b-b93b-e2f6fe949e53 (AT) e23g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

*Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.

What is ugly about SQL joins? *Why are fnction calls not ugly?
OOPs. Wrong newsgroup.


Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old   
cr113
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 04:15 PM


On Feb 12, 8:22*am, "David Cressey" <cresse... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:
Quote:
"cr113" <cr... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:a6634bec-eda0-477b-b93b-e2f6fe949e53 (AT) e23g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

*Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.

What is ugly about SQL joins? *Why are fnction calls not ugly?
OOPs. Wrong newsgroup.


Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old   
cr113
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 04:15 PM


On Feb 12, 8:22*am, "David Cressey" <cresse... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:
Quote:
"cr113" <cr... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:a6634bec-eda0-477b-b93b-e2f6fe949e53 (AT) e23g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

*Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.

What is ugly about SQL joins? *Why are fnction calls not ugly?
OOPs. Wrong newsgroup.


Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old   
cr113
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Normalizing Tree Data - 02-12-2008 , 04:15 PM


On Feb 12, 8:22*am, "David Cressey" <cresse... (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:
Quote:
"cr113" <cr... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:a6634bec-eda0-477b-b93b-e2f6fe949e53 (AT) e23g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad... (AT) pei (DOT) sympatico.ca> wrote:

*Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.

What is ugly about SQL joins? *Why are fnction calls not ugly?
OOPs. Wrong newsgroup.


Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 10 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »



Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


Contact Us - dbTalk Databases Forums - Archive - Top