Gints Plivna wrote:

That's a non-answer if I ever heard one. The design criteria for primary
keys are uniqueness, irreducibility, familiarity, stability and
simplicity -- not necessarily in that order. The criteria frequently
contradict one another requiring the designer to make tradeoffs.

Your attitude basically says you don't have a clue how to do real design
so you use a simplistic rule instead. Evaluating designs and
understanding design tradeoffs is central to what we do.

Gints Plivna wrote:

That's a non-answer if I ever heard one. The design criteria for primary
keys are uniqueness, irreducibility, familiarity, stability and
simplicity -- not necessarily in that order. The criteria frequently
contradict one another requiring the designer to make tradeoffs.

Your attitude basically says you don't have a clue how to do real design
so you use a simplistic rule instead. Evaluating designs and
understanding design tradeoffs is central to what we do.

Gints Plivna wrote:

That's a non-answer if I ever heard one. The design criteria for primary
keys are uniqueness, irreducibility, familiarity, stability and
simplicity -- not necessarily in that order. The criteria frequently
contradict one another requiring the designer to make tradeoffs.

Your attitude basically says you don't have a clue how to do real design
so you use a simplistic rule instead. Evaluating designs and
understanding design tradeoffs is central to what we do.

Gints Plivna wrote:

That's a non-answer if I ever heard one. The design criteria for primary
keys are uniqueness, irreducibility, familiarity, stability and
simplicity -- not necessarily in that order. The criteria frequently
contradict one another requiring the designer to make tradeoffs.

Your attitude basically says you don't have a clue how to do real design
so you use a simplistic rule instead. Evaluating designs and
understanding design tradeoffs is central to what we do.

Gints Plivna wrote:

That's a non-answer if I ever heard one. The design criteria for primary
keys are uniqueness, irreducibility, familiarity, stability and
simplicity -- not necessarily in that order. The criteria frequently
contradict one another requiring the designer to make tradeoffs.

Your attitude basically says you don't have a clue how to do real design
so you use a simplistic rule instead. Evaluating designs and
understanding design tradeoffs is central to what we do.

Gints Plivna wrote:

That's a non-answer if I ever heard one. The design criteria for primary
keys are uniqueness, irreducibility, familiarity, stability and
simplicity -- not necessarily in that order. The criteria frequently
contradict one another requiring the designer to make tradeoffs.

Your attitude basically says you don't have a clue how to do real design
so you use a simplistic rule instead. Evaluating designs and
understanding design tradeoffs is central to what we do.

Gints Plivna wrote:

That's a non-answer if I ever heard one. The design criteria for primary
keys are uniqueness, irreducibility, familiarity, stability and
simplicity -- not necessarily in that order. The criteria frequently
contradict one another requiring the designer to make tradeoffs.

Your attitude basically says you don't have a clue how to do real design
so you use a simplistic rule instead. Evaluating designs and
understanding design tradeoffs is central to what we do.

Gints Plivna wrote:

That's a non-answer if I ever heard one. The design criteria for primary
keys are uniqueness, irreducibility, familiarity, stability and
simplicity -- not necessarily in that order. The criteria frequently
contradict one another requiring the designer to make tradeoffs.

Your attitude basically says you don't have a clue how to do real design
so you use a simplistic rule instead. Evaluating designs and
understanding design tradeoffs is central to what we do.

SELECT
Opinions_We_Will_All_Come_To_Regret.Incoherent_Bla thering_Studded_With_Meaningless_Buzzwords_And_Sal ted_with_Enough_Jargon_To_Make_You_Feel_Inadequate

FROM Morons_Paid_Too_Much_By_Clueless_People,
Opinions_We_Will_All_Come_To_Regret,
Ideas_Which_Are_Dead_But_Manage_Like_Zombies_To_Ar ise_And_Eat_The_Brains_Of_The_Living
WHERE
Morons_Paid_Too_Much_By_Clueless_People.Name_Used_ For_Publicity_Purposes
=
Opinions_We_Will_All_Come_To_Regret.Name_Supplied_ By_Admin_Assistant_When_A_Speaking_Slot_Openned_Up
AND
Ideas_Which_Are_Dead_But_Manage_Like_Zombies_To_Ar ise_And_Eat_The_Brains_Of_The_Living.Term_Original ly_Stolen_From_A_Distantly_Related_Discipline
IN
Opinions_We_Will_All_Come_To_Regret.The_List_Of_Th ings_Last_Weeks_Trade_Journals_Seemed_To_Be_Intere sted_In;

SELECT
Opinions_We_Will_All_Come_To_Regret.Incoherent_Bla thering_Studded_With_Meaningless_Buzzwords_And_Sal ted_with_Enough_Jargon_To_Make_You_Feel_Inadequate

FROM Morons_Paid_Too_Much_By_Clueless_People,
Opinions_We_Will_All_Come_To_Regret,
Ideas_Which_Are_Dead_But_Manage_Like_Zombies_To_Ar ise_And_Eat_The_Brains_Of_The_Living
WHERE
Morons_Paid_Too_Much_By_Clueless_People.Name_Used_ For_Publicity_Purposes
=
Opinions_We_Will_All_Come_To_Regret.Name_Supplied_ By_Admin_Assistant_When_A_Speaking_Slot_Openned_Up
AND
Ideas_Which_Are_Dead_But_Manage_Like_Zombies_To_Ar ise_And_Eat_The_Brains_Of_The_Living.Term_Original ly_Stolen_From_A_Distantly_Related_Discipline
IN
Opinions_We_Will_All_Come_To_Regret.The_List_Of_Th ings_Last_Weeks_Trade_Journals_Seemed_To_Be_Intere sted_In;