 | |
#191
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: Flash to JOG -
03-15-2008
, 09:32 AM
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
#192
| |||
| |||
|
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
#193
| |||
| |||
|
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
#194
| |||
| |||
|
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
#195
| |||
| |||
|
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
#196
| |||
| |||
|
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
#197
| |||
| |||
|
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
#198
| |||
| |||
|
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
#199
| |||
| |||
|
|
I appreciate the comments David (although I think most of the vitriol has been directed at topmind in this case). In general I think that the OO vanguard (as opposed to the rest of us who just use OO as a necessasry tool) have trouble with the conceptual/logical layer distinction that we all seem to see as bright as day. If nothing else our discussions with comp.oo have made me wonder why there are no programming languages that actively delineate the two, and break the concept that systems such as RM are merely for persistence. I am building one or trying to for the new db core I have built. (No |
I first designed a computing that first separate the logical from the
physical then the logical from the media layer. The media layer
gathers all protocols and methods that handle both designer and end
user view.
See related thread for more info.
 |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.