I'm looking for someone, someone I can get an email from confirming
their opinion for presenting a standard for deleing employees in an HR
database.

The issue is we have thousands of workers and hire several each day,
some of whom we make an offer but they fail to show. Once the offer
has been made we open a record for them even though they may not show.
We want to, and and IS dept. to convince that these records must not
be deleted.

I need a solid opinion form an HR database person who can state their
views on this.

Does anyone out there know of such as scenario?

Thanks!!

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.

slinky wrote:

The purpose of HR depts is to make employees think they are happy even
when they really aren't. As far as HR is concerned, the purpose of mgmt
is to make the HR dept's employees people think they are happy even when
they really aren't so as to fulfill the first purpose. By this
definition, no HR person, database or otherwise, will ever state his own
view, nor should he be expected to. Sensible shareholders know and
expect this.


So you have a couple of thousand new phantoms every year. If you want a
binding answer, don't ask the HR dept, go see the big noise. From what
you wrote, I'd say you have too much time on your hands.