![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
How does your 'is' program compare with 'sqsh'? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
How does your 'is' program compare with 'sqsh'? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ah! I also notice sqsh was rewritten with ctlib, |

#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
That's a great question, and I wish I could give you a decent answer. Mine originated in '89 or '90. Certainly it was finished by '91. I've had little need for another. Perhaps I'll take a look at sqsh... |
|
Ed Avis wrote: How does your 'is' program compare with 'sqsh'? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thomas Gagné <tgagne (AT) wide-open-west (DOT) com> wrote in news:403EC32F.7030601 (AT) wide-open-west (DOT) com: Ah! I also notice sqsh was rewritten with ctlib, How about you take over sqsh and put in the features of 'is'? ![]() I like sqsh's use of GNU readline. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
and redirection. Those are the two things I use most. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
snip I like sqsh's use of GNU readline. and redirection. Those are the two things I use most. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
snip Oh yes, how could I have forgotten ... I also thought of taking the s/w and making it work for Oracle but never seem to have the time. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |