![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
I wonder how difficult that would be. Of course it would be easier using ODBC, but setting up ODBC on Linux seems a hassle. I've started it a couple times but never got all the right components. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
is does the redirection as well with syntax similar to sqsh. I like where sqsh puts the redirection--after the "go". I didn't notice if sqsh supports input redirection--allowing SQL to be read from multiple places. It probably does. |

#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
How does your 'is' program compare with 'sqsh'? -- Ed Avis <ed (AT) membled (DOT) com |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thomas Gagné <tgagne (AT) wide-open-west (DOT) com> wrote in news:403F71C9.2080003 (AT) wide-open-west (DOT) com: is does the redirection as well with syntax similar to sqsh. I like where sqsh puts the redirection--after the "go". I didn't notice if sqsh supports input redirection--allowing SQL to be read from multiple places. It probably does. Are you considering taking over 'sqsh' ? ![]() |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:21:22 +0000, Pablo Sanchez wrote: Thomas Gagn? <tgagne (AT) wide-open-west (DOT) com> wrote in news:403EC32F.7030601 (AT) wide-open-west (DOT) com: Ah! I also notice sqsh was rewritten with ctlib, How about you take over sqsh and put in the features of 'is'? ![]() I like sqsh's use of GNU readline. and redirection. Those are the two things I use most. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Michael Peppler <mpeppler (AT) peppler (DOT) org> wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:21:22 +0000, Pablo Sanchez wrote: Thomas Gagn? <tgagne (AT) wide-open-west (DOT) com> wrote in news:403EC32F.7030601 (AT) wide-open-west (DOT) com: Ah! I also notice sqsh was rewritten with ctlib, How about you take over sqsh and put in the features of 'is'? ![]() I like sqsh's use of GNU readline. and redirection. Those are the two things I use most. Yep, and \bcp comes third. It's so easy to copy the result of a select (without creating a view) into a table on the same or another server. Someone should build in longer varchar support ... |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Ed Avis" <ed (AT) membled (DOT) com> wrote in message news:l1ishtldwb.fsf (AT) budvar (DOT) future-i.net... How does your 'is' program compare with 'sqsh'? -- Ed Avis <ed (AT) membled (DOT) com IMO, sqsh is more user-friendly for everyday manual querying purposes (life without sqsh is hard for me...). Thomas' 'is' has the unique feature that a result set can be formatted as XML or HTML without any programming effort. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |