![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
on http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuni...tgreSQL_Server {{{ For situations where a small amount of data loss is acceptable in return for a large boost in how many updates you can do to the database per second, consider switching to synchronous commit }}} I am not a native english speaker, but I think this is wrong. I guess it should be "... consider switching synchronous commit off". |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thomas Guettler wrote: on http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuni...tgreSQL_Server {{{ For situations where a small amount of data loss is acceptable in return for a large boost in how many updates you can do to the database per second, consider switching to synchronous commit }}} I am not a native english speaker, but I think this is wrong. I guess it should be "... consider switching synchronous commit off". You are right. See http://www.postgresql.org/docs/curre...HRONOUS-COMMIT |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |