Re: Whatever happened to Jasmine

#1

On 13 Feb., 10:57, Roy Hann <specia... (AT) processed (DOT) almost.meat> wrote:

Quote:

I'm starting a new thread for this.

michaelnewp... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote:
On Feb 8, 3:06 pm, Geo Victim <geovic... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
[...]
3. Why are Ingres Corp. pushing Vectorwise over its own RDBMS like CA
tried pushing Jasmine and neglecting Ingres?

[...]

whatever happened to Jasmine.....or any other OO db ?

It's a zero billion dollar business.

I am now using Postgres, which describes itself as an ORDBMS....it
seems just like an RDBMS to me

Well spotted. *The clever folks behind it understand that classes are
data types. *The blockheads behind Jasmine thought classes were
tables. *An elementary but catastrophic blunder. *

ps Ingres always suffered from 'low-visibility'

Set up some Google Alerts to see how that's changed.

one day ;-)

in the meantime you can discuss with Mladen.....

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Re: Whatever happened to Jasmine

comp.databases.postgresql comp.databases.postgresql

Re: Whatever happened to Jasmine - 02-14-2011 , 12:49 AM