![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
So, Postgresql will simply ignore "GLOBAL" or "LOCAL" and will create a local temporary table anyway? Why is that? Don't get me wrong, local temporary tables are a great replacement for cursors, but global temporary tables have their uses too. Is there any hope that we will have global temporary tables in the foreseeable future? Another popular variety of databases supports global temporary tables but not local temporary tables. It would be very nice to have a standard terminology, wouldn't it? |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
So, Postgresql will simply ignore "GLOBAL" or "LOCAL" and will create a local temporary table anyway? Why is that? Don't get me wrong, local temporary tables are a great replacement for cursors, but global temporary tables have their uses too. Is there any hope that we will have global temporary tables in the foreseeable future? Another popular variety of databases supports global temporary tables but not local temporary tables. It would be very nice to have a standard terminology, wouldn't it? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |