Marco Mariani <marco (AT) sferacarta (DOT) com> writes:
Quote:
Bob Badour wrote:
[SQLAlchemy is not fugly,] it's clean and cute, and it's the only
ORM I know of that shows some respect for the SQL below.
What SQL below?
Is this a trick question?
The one that is generated on the fly by the SQL Expression layer and
is executed by the DMBS |
Note that ORM refers specifically to an Object-Relational Mapper. To use
the ORM would be to construct objects, perform object operations on
them, and have those invisibly translated by the ORM into database
operations.
If you're using the SQL expression generator of SQLAlchemy, that's
explicitly not using the ORM, it's constructing SQL using object syntax.
Quite a different (and, IMO, less-fugly) thing altogether.
I often use SQLAlchemy, but never for its ORM.
--
\ “Kissing a smoker is like licking an ashtray.” —anonymous |
`\ |
_o__) |
Ben Finney