 | |
English help: name a boolean value that means "if it makes senseto calculate the sum of the field"
comp.databases.postgresql comp.databases.postgresql
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: [SOLVED] Re: English help: name a boolean value that means "ifit makes sense to calculate the sum of the field" -
06-16-2008
, 01:50 AM
|
This is a business-logic question, not a data question. The database should not be storing how to use a column in another column. That is not data modeling. (All generalizations disclaimed with "usually".) |
must make a database application that allows user to add new type of
data without changing database structure (a.k.a. no ALTER TABLE). This is
the bidding requirement and other competitors all say they can do that.
In the end we got the contract and we have to follow what we promised.
We have a vertical table where all data are like this:
id|data|type
01|0033|03
01|0344|06
....
#92
| |||
| |||
|
|
This is a business-logic question, not a data question. The database should not be storing how to use a column in another column. That is not data modeling. (All generalizations disclaimed with "usually".) |
must make a database application that allows user to add new type of
data without changing database structure (a.k.a. no ALTER TABLE). This is
the bidding requirement and other competitors all say they can do that.
In the end we got the contract and we have to follow what we promised.
We have a vertical table where all data are like this:
id|data|type
01|0033|03
01|0344|06
....
#93
| |||
| |||
|
|
This is a business-logic question, not a data question. The database should not be storing how to use a column in another column. That is not data modeling. (All generalizations disclaimed with "usually".) |
must make a database application that allows user to add new type of
data without changing database structure (a.k.a. no ALTER TABLE). This is
the bidding requirement and other competitors all say they can do that.
In the end we got the contract and we have to follow what we promised.
We have a vertical table where all data are like this:
id|data|type
01|0033|03
01|0344|06
....
#94
| |||
| |||
|
|
This is a business-logic question, not a data question. The database should not be storing how to use a column in another column. That is not data modeling. (All generalizations disclaimed with "usually".) |
must make a database application that allows user to add new type of
data without changing database structure (a.k.a. no ALTER TABLE). This is
the bidding requirement and other competitors all say they can do that.
In the end we got the contract and we have to follow what we promised.
We have a vertical table where all data are like this:
id|data|type
01|0033|03
01|0344|06
....
#95
| |||
| |||
|
|
This is a business-logic question, not a data question. The database should not be storing how to use a column in another column. That is not data modeling. (All generalizations disclaimed with "usually".) |
must make a database application that allows user to add new type of
data without changing database structure (a.k.a. no ALTER TABLE). This is
the bidding requirement and other competitors all say they can do that.
In the end we got the contract and we have to follow what we promised.
We have a vertical table where all data are like this:
id|data|type
01|0033|03
01|0344|06
....
#96
| |||
| |||
|
|
This is a business-logic question, not a data question. The database should not be storing how to use a column in another column. That is not data modeling. (All generalizations disclaimed with "usually".) |
must make a database application that allows user to add new type of
data without changing database structure (a.k.a. no ALTER TABLE). This is
the bidding requirement and other competitors all say they can do that.
In the end we got the contract and we have to follow what we promised.
We have a vertical table where all data are like this:
id|data|type
01|0033|03
01|0344|06
....
#97
| |||
| |||
|
|
This is a business-logic question, not a data question. The database should not be storing how to use a column in another column. That is not data modeling. (All generalizations disclaimed with "usually".) |
must make a database application that allows user to add new type of
data without changing database structure (a.k.a. no ALTER TABLE). This is
the bidding requirement and other competitors all say they can do that.
In the end we got the contract and we have to follow what we promised.
We have a vertical table where all data are like this:
id|data|type
01|0033|03
01|0344|06
....
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.