dbTalk Databases Forums  

Re: RFD: comp.databases.postgresql.*

comp.databases.postgresql.general comp.databases.postgresql.general


Discuss Re: RFD: comp.databases.postgresql.* in the comp.databases.postgresql.general forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Woodchuck Bill
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: RFD: comp.databases.postgresql.* - 11-23-2004 , 05:50 AM






Patrick May <pjm (AT) spe (DOT) com> wrote in
news:m2r7mk24uv.fsf (AT) gulch (DOT) intamission.com:

Quote:
Interesting. Does this affect anyone's views on the group name
(yes, I'm looking at you, Ms. Morgan) or is the feeling that existing
users wouldn't switch to a new name, even if it were archived by
Google?
If they were to start their own hierarchy postgresql.*, they could keep all
21 of the groups, all of the groups would be available upon request to news
servers around the world, Google would pick them up again in a heartbeat,
they would not need to pass a vote, and PostgreSQL would have even more
prestige by having a dedicated net news hierarchy.

Even if they were to be moved to alt.comp.*, they would be legitimate and
available by request, no vote required, back in Google, and they could keep
all 21 of the groups. But no, our defiant list owner prefers to be stubborn
and keep things the way they are, which has already resulted in
fragmentation of his rogue hierarchy as Google has dropped them, and other
servers will probably follow now that the rogue nature of these groups is
being more publicized due to this RFD.

Something to think about, Marc.

--
Bill


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.