![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
From: Greg Stark <gsstark (AT) mit (DOT) edu Subject: Re: Need some advice on appropriate PL strategy... Message-ID: <874ql033q0.fsf (AT) stark (DOT) xeocode.com "Eric D. Nielsen" <nielsene (AT) MIT (DOT) EDU> writes: I guess I could alternatively just code up a simple mail function in another PL and then call that function from pl/pgsql. Is there any merit to this approach over the "whole-trigger" in another PL method? Well depending on your application this may be a reasonable approach. However you should at least think carefully before taking this route. It means the email processing is put into the critical path of performing the original update. I would suggest you consider another model, where you have a second process that connects to the database and checks for updates. It can either stay connected all the time and the trigger can use NOTIFY to wake it up. Or it can just check periodically. This has the advantage that you can write in any language that has a postgres driver, including PHP. It also means you can perform your database updates without having them depend on some large external system. This is a big advantage. It means when the system's borked you can keep your web application running and have it catch up when things are fixed. And it means when things are slow or erroneous you have one fewer moving parts to confuse you when debugging. |
Your suggestion is also much more flexible -- digesting
#2
| |||
| |||
|
I was hoping for a get/easy solution, but those never pan out ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |