 | |
List of postgresql rogue groups (was Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general)
comp.databases.postgresql.general comp.databases.postgresql.general
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
 
| |||
| |||
|
List of postgresql rogue groups (was Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general) -
11-08-2004
, 12:13 PM
|
The other issue is that I would like to add the other postgresql groups for consideration to be included into the big 8. However there are quite a few of them, and I don't know if all of them deserve to be there. They are all under comp.databases.postgresql.*, and I highly doubt Marc would want to eliminate them. I will have to include them all and have a heavy postgresql presense in the comp.databases.* hierarchy. I have no advice to offer on this. How many are there exactly? |
comp.databases.postgresql.admin
comp.databases.postgresql.advocacy
comp.databases.postgresql.announce
comp.databases.postgresql.bugs
comp.databases.postgresql.committers
comp.databases.postgresql.docs
comp.databases.postgresql.general
comp.databases.postgresql.hackers
comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces
comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.jdbc
comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.odbc
comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.pgadmin.hacke rs
comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.pgadmin.suppo rt
comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.php
comp.databases.postgresql.novice
comp.databases.postgresql.patches
comp.databases.postgresql.performance
comp.databases.postgresql.ports
comp.databases.postgresql.ports.cygwin
comp.databases.postgresql.questions
comp.databases.postgresql.sql
--
Bill
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
barbara (AT) bookpro (DOT) com wrote in news:10outlgpkitaq20 (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com: The other issue is that I would like to add the other postgresql groups for consideration to be included into the big 8. However there are quite a few of them, and I don't know if all of them deserve to be there. They are all under comp.databases.postgresql.*, and I highly doubt Marc would want to eliminate them. |
parallel process. Let's start with a few and create the other groups down
the road. An RFD with 21 groups has a good chance to be rejected, not
because they are not relevant, just because it's too many at one time. I
assume a second RFD should be 'filed' in 6 months with the remaining groups,
and should be nothing more than a cruise.
Nax
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
barbara (AT) bookpro (DOT) com wrote in news:10outlgpkitaq20 (AT) corp (DOT) supernews.com: The other issue is that I would like to add the other postgresql groups for consideration to be included into the big 8. However there are quite a few of them, and I don't know if all of them deserve to be there. They are all under comp.databases.postgresql.*, and I highly doubt Marc would want to eliminate them. I think Marc understands by now that these lists won't be eliminated. It's a parallel process. Let's start with a few and create the other groups down the road. An RFD with 21 groups has a good chance to be rejected, not because they are not relevant, just because it's too many at one time. I assume a second RFD should be 'filed' in 6 months with the remaining groups, and should be nothing more than a cruise. |
like he did. There is no way in hell that your gonna get *ALL* the
newsgroups. Thats not how Usenet works. Be happy with whatever you get.
We're doing you the favor. Not the other way around. Show us some
appreciation for Christs sake.
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.