 | |
#41
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: UI - Period. -
10-30-2005
, 01:48 PM
|
With no offense meant to anyone, I think that most here would agree that PICK people are sort of an odd lot. People in other related fields might even see an almost religious fervor amongst us. I think that there is a reason for this and that it is somehow embedded in the system. |
business people; which makes them use technology in a manner that furthers
their company goals. Technologists have no such frame of reference when
deciding on a technology. They generally select technology that's "cool"
then inform others to select the technology that meets their current goals.
This is a simple receipe for higher costs both in the short and long term.
[snipped]
Quote:
|
I hope that the above wasn't a meaningless side track but one of the things that I believe poses (posed?) the greatest threat to MV as anything beyond a museum curiosity is the loss of that strangely useful and intuitive collection of 'stuff'. If only one piece (data model) remains the power is lost; it is just another backend. |
threads over the last few years. An mvDbms has an advantage because of of
all the tools "within" it. It used to have an advantage in cost but that
has disappeared and is now a rather large impediment to moving current mV
apps to the mainstream. Strip those tools away, or keep allowing the cost
imbalance to occur, and one should move to SQL Server, or whatever, as soon
as possible.
[snipped]
Bill
#42
| |||
| |||
|
|
has disappeared and is now a rather large impediment to moving current mV apps to the mainstream. Strip those tools away, or keep allowing the cost imbalance to occur, and one should move to SQL Server, or whatever, as soon as possible. [snipped] Bill Bill, |
Doesn't that argue the case for OpenQM?
Jeff
 |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.