![]() | |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Luke Webber wrote: I see you have the hardware associated with a few platforms. In addition to Honeywell for Ultimate there was the DEC (VAX) Ultimate, which I believe was a firmware implementation - and significant in its own right for that. The Honeywell Level 6 and DPS6 implementations were firmware, as were the earlier DEC QBus versions (the 1500, 2000 and 3000 series). But I don't believe the VAX version was. Level 6 "firmware" was contained in Writable Control Store (WCS) which was a little softer than firm; it was a RAM, not a ROM. Also, not all the O/S was in the WCS; the equivalent of "monitor code" was written in assembly language. In some of the earlier releases, a few of the "Pick" virtual assembly language instructions were executed in software, as well. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Luke Webber wrote: The Honeywell Level 6 and DPS6 implementations were firmware, as were the earlier DEC QBus versions (the 1500, 2000 and 3000 series). But I don't believe the VAX version was. Level 6 "firmware" was contained in Writable Control Store (WCS) which was a little softer than firm; it was a RAM, not a ROM. |
|
Also, not all the O/S was in the WCS; the equivalent of "monitor code" was written in assembly language. In some of the earlier releases, a few of the "Pick" virtual assembly language instructions were executed in software, as well. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tony Gravagno wrote: Thanks for the effort Dawn. You'll need to get confirmation of these notes, my memory is real vague on all this and I never was a Pick history buff. I did have more notes but scratched them the closer I looked. ![]() I see you have the hardware associated with a few platforms. I put in some that I thought might be of historical significance. Showing IBM at the start (at the same time Codd was at IBM researching the relational model, by the way) as well as at the end of the history seemed significant enough to point out. In addition to Honeywell for Ultimate there was the DEC (VAX) Ultimate, which I believe was a firmware implementation - and significant in its own right for that. The three companies currently involved with the jBASE DBMS are jBASE International, Temenos, and mPower1. This is as of 2002 when Mpower1 acquired rights for support and distribution. Ref: http://www.jbase.com/about/ and elsewhere. "jBASE" is listed as "Maintains an MV System in application". Technically that's not accurate as jBASE does not have an application but Temenos does. Yes, that happened after I published this version, so I will work on straightening that out. I can only include so much info, so I don't know if jbase.com is even relevant in this diagram. I should perhaps take that question to the jbase list. I can't suggest exactly how this should all be displayed but as it is it's not 100% accurate. ADP is mentioned in the Reality branch. From recent CDP discussions and e-mail exchanges, I see they are still a player in the auto dealership vertical market. I don't know if they just lock-down stock DBMS releases or if they are still categorized as a licensee. I thought they were maintaining it themselves, but maybe someone else knows more about this. I did not get a contact for that implementation to interview for this diagram and it would be good to have one. If they are a licensee, this could make them one of the longest running licensee/resellers out there. Anyway you look at it, they are one of the longest running MultiValue implementations, I would think. Datatel, my former employer, was started in 1968 (making it one of the oldest existing application software companies, I suspect) and is another long running MV VAR. I don't know when they started with it, but they went from Microdata IIRC to Prime Information to UniData. Noting the MultiValue logo, it's a shame that SMA isn't recognized somewhere in the mix as having an impact on some of the cross-platform standards that we still enjoy today. Good point. I tried to come up with a way to recognize them since they didn't fit the other categories and decided that using the logo was a way to do that. I could put a URL to their site or the explanation of the logo on the next version. I'll check with Gus. Might be Pick-ayune, but I doubt whether the distinction between Advanced Pick and AP Pro is worthy of mention. That is helpful to know. I took info from many people and sources. I never worked on the PICK side of the house, so I appreciate that type of input. AP Protected mode was just one step off from AP Native, which isn't mentioned there, and I don't think Native is worthy either considering Pick was originally a native platform in the first place. If AP PRO is in there then so should be AP DOS (EOL 5.2.5) and AP Native (EOL 5.2.7). If not, and this is my preference, I'd suggest scratching AP PRO and just leaving Adv Pick. That is what I'll do. Also under "ports", was Data General really a licensee or were MV products merely ported over DG/UX? I had that one on-again, off-again when I was developing it. My criteria for inclusion on that list was not really tight. My interest is less on licensing than on whether there was an implementation of the languages that was separate from other implementations (a "port" to that platform). But my notes are not clear enough for me to figure out who gave me DG information so I could ask some follow-up questions. Hopefully others will know. I think there are other items in this list that might stand out as being of a different ilk too and would like to identify those. Finally, we often hear Jim Idle say "jBASE is not Pick", and I know that confuses people. We see in the tree that MDIS had impact on JAC where jBASE was written, and the license was subsequently transferred to jBASE International. But to understand that history I found a neat article which explains that process _and_ really explains well how and why jBASE was developed. This provides some compelling insight into jBASE, and may help to explain why jBASE may be better positioned than some other MV platforms for the open market. Ref: http://www.ukpua.org/archives/articles/JAC.html Yes, I believe that was one of my sources, although I did talk to Jim too at some point, if I recall correctly. Regards, T Thanks a bunch. --dawn |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
I understand the focus and complexity of what's already there, but it's sort of a shame to not see some of the milestones. Like: - When did Dick first discuss porting Pick to IBM - and then decide he didn't want to? - Who had the first MV/Unix port? - I believe AP was the first commercial database (MV or otherwise) ported to Linux. Can someone contest that? Just going on... Thanks again. T |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hey Peter, I remember seeing your EDGE - 'redefining the desktop' is a term that springs to mind :-) |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Ross I would have thought boat anchor would have been a better description. It filled my long wheel base LandRover and took several removalists to shift out of my office. Of course it also caused some extremely "interesting" moves in the marketing area from a certain Lionel Singer and Pyramid. In relation to Dawn's request there are a couple of names for her history Lionel Singer - Prime + Primos - Pyramid - Universe (I think). A gentleman accountant from Canberra with many talents. I believe his first foray into the IT field was with Wang. He certainly made a big impression for a little guy. "Ross Ferris" <rossf (AT) stamina (DOT) com.au> wrote in message news:1132620278.793167.226180 (AT) o13g2000cwo (DOT) googlegroups.com... Hey Peter, I remember seeing your EDGE - 'redefining the desktop' is a term that springs to mind :-) |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Ross I would have thought boat anchor would have been a better description. It filled my long wheel base LandRover and took several removalists to shift out of my office. Of course it also caused some extremely "interesting" moves in the marketing area from a certain Lionel Singer and Pyramid. In relation to Dawn's request there are a couple of names for her history Lionel Singer - Prime + Primos - Pyramid - Universe (I think). A gentleman accountant from Canberra with many talents. I believe his first foray into the IT field was with Wang. He certainly made a big impression for a little guy. "Ross Ferris" <rossf (AT) stamina (DOT) com.au> wrote in message news:1132620278.793167.226180 (AT) o13g2000cwo (DOT) googlegroups.com... Hey Peter, I remember seeing your EDGE - 'redefining the desktop' is a term that springs to mind :-) |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
Quite an impression. At Tina Turner show in the Sydney Hilton in 1984, ten or so of us sat down and the first thing Lionel did was take off his shoe and put it on the table; it had a phone in it. |
|
Excalibur wrote: Hi Ross I would have thought boat anchor would have been a better description. It filled my long wheel base LandRover and took several removalists to shift out of my office. Of course it also caused some extremely "interesting" moves in the marketing area from a certain Lionel Singer and Pyramid. In relation to Dawn's request there are a couple of names for her history Lionel Singer - Prime + Primos - Pyramid - Universe (I think). A gentleman accountant from Canberra with many talents. I believe his first foray into the IT field was with Wang. He certainly made a big impression for a little guy. "Ross Ferris" <rossf (AT) stamina (DOT) com.au> wrote in message news:1132620278.793167.226180 (AT) o13g2000cwo (DOT) googlegroups.com... Hey Peter, I remember seeing your EDGE - 'redefining the desktop' is a term that springs to mind :-) Regards, |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |