![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Has anyone had success with installing D3 9.0 on Red Hat 6.0 yet? Apparently the 32-Bit mode is supposed to work (but doesnt), and the 64-Bit does not even get past the D3_setup stage. I am aware that TL are not "certifying" this platform yet, but as this is now RED HAT's default platform, it would appear they should. I have a few sites wishing to upgrade to D3-9.0, and whilst we do this, we were going to upgrade hardware and hence O/S. Their new systems might as well be "today's" environment. I have also found that the terminfo is missing the WYSE60 drivers? John |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Has anyone had success with installing D3 9.0 on Red Hat 6.0 yet? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Dec 9, 2:38 am wrote: Has anyone had success with installing D3 9.0 on Red Hat 6.0 yet? Apparently the 32-Bit mode is supposed to work (but doesnt), and the 64-Bit does not even get past the D3_setup stage. I am aware that TL are not "certifying" this platform yet, but as this is now RED HAT's default platform, it would appear they should. I have a few sites wishing to upgrade to D3-9.0, and whilst we do this, we were going to upgrade hardware and hence O/S. Their new systems might as well be "today's" environment. I have also found that the terminfo is missing the WYSE60 drivers? John John, I have had good luck using this package on RHEL 5 and Unidata http://code.google.com/p/wy60/ HTH, Steve That program is listed as a terminal emulator, but I'd call it more of a |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
From Newsgroup: comp.databases.pick On Dec 8, 11:38 pm, j... (AT) mrpsystems (DOT) co.uk wrote: Has anyone had success with installing D3 9.0 on Red Hat 6.0 yet? One of the (many) improvements in D3 Linux 9.0 is the support for CentOS. I would apply my efforts there. /Scott Ballinger Pareto Corporation Edmonds WA USA 206 713 6006 |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Scott wrote: One of the (many) improvements in D3 Linux 9.0 is the support for CentOS. I would apply my efforts there. I'll second Scott on this. I've got 9.0 running on a CentOS 5.5 x64 machine. Works great. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Whilst your zeal is commendable, I'd be happy keeping my customers back a step or 2 from the bleeding edge - there is a lot to be said for a stable, supported platform, and REALISTICALLY what are you/your users looking at doing with RH6 that they can't do with 5? Personally I'd go 64 bit Centos 5.5 so that I could have upto 3Gb RAM allocated --> we did some recent virtualization tests internally on this platform over VMware & Hyper-V (yeah, I know Hyper-V isn't "supported" by Tl either!!), vs bare iron, and whilst I was initially "concerned" about running on 64 bit, it will now be our preferred D3 deployment platform moving forward. (Of course, I'd like to see a "real" 64 bit version of D3 that supported MORE RAM, but I figure SSD's are getting cheaper every day :-) Well, we once moved from rhel5.0 to 5.4 just because it natively |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
From Newsgroup: comp.databases.pick Personally I'd go 64 bit Centos 5.5 so that I could have upto 3Gb RAM allocated --> we did some recent virtualization tests internally on this platform over VMware & Hyper-V (yeah, I know Hyper-V isn't "supported" by Tl either!!), vs bare iron, and whilst I was initially "concerned" about running on 64 bit, it will now be our preferred D3 deployment platform moving forward. Ross, my v9 instance is running inside the free edition of ESXi from VMWare |

#10
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |