"Mike Preece" <michael (AT) preece (DOT) net> wrote

??? Huh ???
*scratches head*

Am I the only one looking clueless here? (It wouldn't be the first time!)

Bruce A. Holt wrote:
I figured I had missed an inside joke, so count me amont the clueless
too.

Mike, give us a sign. cheers! --dawn

I thought it was only me!!!

Simon
"dawn" <dawnwolthuis (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

Mike Preece wrote:

Is this anything to do with the man at the zoo?

He saw the sign...

"Beware the lama spits"

and he was.

"John Bend" <spam (AT) itstuff (DOT) net> wrote

*snort*

According to my twisted sense of humor, that's funny *schtuff*!

-Bruce

In my head I now have a picture of His Holiness
the 14TH Dalai Lama of Tibet spitting on a man
at the zoo. =`:^o

I keep telling myself "Llama!" but it's not
helping. =':^<

--
frosty

"frosty" <frostyj (AT) bogus (DOT) tld> wrote

Wow if I knew it was this easy to start a meaningless (but quite
entertaining) thread, I'd have tried it myself a while ago...

But we still don't know the genesis of the original post...do we?

I'm sure it's gonna be a disappointment.

BFaux ;-)

HHGTTG - LOL
Mike, what brought this on?

Tony Gravagno wrote:
Ah, you nailed it. Hitchhiker's Guide... Beware the leopard. There
is no way my brain would have come up with that. (I'm thinking that
might be a good thing, however).

Part of the mystery is solved. The other part is to find out what
state Mike was in when he decided the exact right thing to do would be
to post this message.

Cheers! --dawn
P.S. Clearly spending hours scanning and photoshopping a 1965
historical document was not nearly the discussion starter this was.
I'll have to adjust my strategy accordingly ;-)

"Tony Gravagno" <g6q3x9lu53001 (AT) sneakemail (DOT) com.invalid> wrote

Of course!!! *smacks self in the forehead*