dbTalk Databases Forums  

Re: Another failed conversion from MV?

comp.databases.pick comp.databases.pick


Discuss Re: Another failed conversion from MV? in the comp.databases.pick forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old   
Ross Ferris
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Another failed conversion from MV? - 08-18-2005 , 06:49 AM






The backend code has now been updated so that it can be called from the
existing 4GL/green screen routines and Visage. You may recall some of
the "interesting" file structures used - with control file records and
multi-values nested up to 5 levels deep ... these have now be
formalized into "normal" Visage dictionaries !

Not sure if the US version has the "interesting" Red-Book file
structures, with multiple record types - if it does, you may appreciate
that the whole cascading carline/make/model/year/model red-book
structure can be driven without having to write a single line of code !
More power to the dictionary !!


Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old   
murthi
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Another failed conversion from MV? - 08-18-2005 , 11:20 AM






No, actually the greatest invention was the thermos (vacuum) flask. As to
why, listen to the clueless one - "it keeps hot things hot and cold things
cold ... how do it know???'

Chandru

"Ross Ferris" <rossf (AT) stamina (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:
That would be the Pneumatic tyre (or tire for you), which in turn was
the greatest thing since the wheel, which was in turn was ....




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.